https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288759
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@in.waw.pl Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |zbyszek@in.waw.pl Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- The description is nice, but a bit too high-level ;). Please add a bit of down-to-earth stuff like "this package can be used to ...".
Where is it specified that the license is GPLv3+ (and and GPLv3)?
python2-commit.i686: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
That's because the spec in srpm is different than the standalone version. The standalone version is OK.
python2-commit.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/commit/operator/operator_c.c python2-commit.i686: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/commit/operator/operator.pyx python python2-commit.i686: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/commit/operator/operator.pyx 644 python
Those appear to be source files that should be removed from the binary package.
What about the documentation? The documentation is nice, but maybe it's good enough if people can access it online.