Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226301
Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb@jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |limb@jcomserv.net
--- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2008-09-17 12:32:09 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM: clean
rpmlint on RPMS:
planner.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/planner.schemas A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.
Probably ok?
planner.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided mrproject If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides.
planner.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided libmrproject If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides.
planner.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided libmrproject-devel If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides.
Fix.
planner-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files.
planner-eds.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files.
I have to think there's SOMETHING you could move over to these from the main package?
planner-eds.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/evolution-data-server-1.2/extensions/libecalbackendplanner.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package.
Is this a false positive? If so, file an rpmlint bug.
Otherwise, full review looks good, no other blockers.