https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #21 from Nalin Dahyabhai nalin@redhat.com --- (In reply to Antonio Murdaca from comment #16)
I've created https://github.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs where I do have .spec(s) and SRPM(s) I'm planning to remove the .spec from the source repo and maintain the .spec at https://github.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs/tree/master/skopeo/fedora/skopeo
FWIW, Fedora's packaging repository will keep its own copy in a branch for each Fedora release (see repositories at http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ for examples).
This license stuff is tricky...I've re-licensed my tool with ASL 2.0 since all my vendors are ASL 2.0 afaict.
Yeah, that should be accurate either way.
I've added the removal of vendor/ when %{with_bundled} is 0 Right now, unluckily, this tool won't build from debundled vendor's copies, and also not all vendors are already in Fedora - but I'm working on packaging them with Lokesh and Jan for a future version
Understood, it's a work in progress.
should I call `make clean` to remove generated files in a %clean section?
Historically, %clean's job was to clean up $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, way back when even using a buildroot was optional. Now that the buildroot is set and cleaned up by default, Fedora doesn't expect you to have a %clean section.