[Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2006-06-11 11:37 EST -------
Thaks, I'll try to roll up a 1.1.4 package in the next few days. As for the
naming convention, it seems stat if qt 4.1.x will make its way into fc5, it will
be called qt4, while qt 3.3.x will be called just qt. So why not to rename your
package to qsa4 (or qsa-qt4), while mine will be called just qsa (or qsa-qt3)?
Wouldn't it be more consistent? I don't mean to be intrusive.