https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237325
--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org --- - automake already requires autoconf, so that's redundant done - consider separating the executables into a -tools subpackage done - the summary field for -devel subpackage seems wrong? Thanks. Fixed. - as the patch is already merged upstream, consider using forge macros and specifying the commit
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_using_... Left it for now. Can drop it on the next release. - use `autoreconf -i` instead of supplied autogen.sh Done. - use plain `%configure` without args and provide the static library in -static, if possible
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_static... Guidelines suggest it is preferable not to include static libraries unless there is a good reason to do so. So, typically do not package them unless there is a dependency that needs the static library.
spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/libtexprintf/fedor... srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/libtexprintf/fedor...