Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl 2006-05-06 15:17 EST ------- Ok,
I kinda strongly prefer the %{_libdir} approach for the dependency handling I concider the other approach somewhat ugly. If a third part package causes things to break we will handle that the. If rpm doesn't mind different timestamps on the README I'm happy with things as they are too. Summarazing, could you attach a new spec with the %{_libdir} approach, then I'll review it,
Thanks.