https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045955
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Newton alexjnewt@fastmail.com --- (In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #12)
Fair enough. I'd prefer not to use company names for package names if not really necessary (abundance of caution, trademarks and all of that). While Debian has a lot of 'lib*' packages we also have some of these in Fedora as well though Fedora also uses '*-libs' for fine-grained dependencies. Anyway
- no strong feelings on my side and in the end even Debian calls the package
"rocm-comgr" if I understood Debian's git repo correctly.
I just checked and you're indeed correct. Not sure why. Colour me surprised :) Regardless, since the source package is different, it gives flexibility to change it later.
Feel free to submit the tweaked spec ("rocm-compilersupport-devel") and I'll do a review to move this forward.
Done, see update below
Just fyi: I recompiled the OpenCL package for F35 but was unable to get "clinfo" to recognize my gfx card. However this is a RX570/gfx803 and the card is not officially supported so it might be also due to unsupported hardware.
Yes, I think to enable the pre-vega experimental support, you need to export ROC_ENABLE_PRE_VEGA=true or something like that. I don't see it documented anywhere, but I noticed it in when I was trying to debug the aarch64 build. As well, I'm told it's really buggy, so be warned :) I should have a vega, so I can test it later.
I also reviewed the licensing and noticed some issues, so I ended up making a pull request anyway.
Spec URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocm-compilersupport.spec SRPM URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocm-compilersupport-5.0.0-1.fc37.src.rpm COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mystro256/rocm-opencl/build/3487501/