https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
I think it might be better to call the package "Elm".
At least cabal-rpm currently assumes that name = pkg_name
for BinLib packages like this and it is also recommended
in the Haskell Guidelines. (Failing that probably need to replace
%{name} with %{pkg_name} in various places in the spec file.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tOX2UNEZg6&a=cc_unsubscribe