Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368
------- Additional Comments From orion@cora.nwra.com 2008-03-27 19:01 EST ------- comment #11)
(In reply to comment #10)
Well, under the current setup, you would get both, with the x86_64 binaries taking precedence. Looks like current plan is to fix yum so that you would only get the preferred architecture.
Ok. I guess at that point I can then make fedora-ds noarch?
You could make it noarch now.
Why is fedora-ds-base multilib at the moment anyway? Is there any reason why you would want to run the 32-bit version on x86_64?
Is it multilib? What makes it multilib? I don't think there is any reason to run the 32-bit version on x86_64.
fedora-ds-base is multilib because it has a -devel sub-package. I believe you can black list it by sending a request to rel-eng@fedoraproject.org.(In reply to