Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795
------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen@gmail.com 2007-02-02 06:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
IMO, all but the sdc-prefixed ones are way too generic. Does this package support --program-prefix?
While I see your point here, I can see using --program-prefix potentially causing problems with dependent packages...
Would it be better to install everything under /usr/sdcc-i386, as suggested for cross compilers? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/CrossCompilers
No. This would conflict with GCC's conventions.
But what would work is to install the apps somewhere outside of %{_bindir}, e.g /usr/lib/sdcc/bin or /usr/libexec/sdcc and to install symlinks or wrapper scripts named "sdcc-<app>" into %{_bindir}
Other packages wanting to use the "non-prefixed" versions then could apply PATH=/usr/lib/scdc/bin:$PATH (or similar) to access the unprefixed versions.
FIXED. Binaries are now installed into /usr/libexec/sdcc, and symlinks are created in /usr/bin.
Updated spec and srpm files are available at ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora