https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2330823
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Steffan jonathansteffan@gmail.com --- (In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #8)
# Build features, default off %bcond_with x264
Could we patch upstream to use OpenH264 ?
https://github.com/WiVRn/WiVRn/issues/208
Upstream is actively engaged with this effort so we'll see if it can easily be added. We should continue forward with the package even without software encoding.
License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND Apache-2.0 AND BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSL-1.0 AND CECILL-C AND CC0-1.0 AND CC-BY-4.0 AND MIT-Khronos-old AND Unlicense AND zlib AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND MIT AND OFL-1.1
I think the right identifier for zlib is Zlib (with the capital Z). Also, CC0-1.0 is normally only allowed for content. Review the blurb on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ and check whether we can fit into one of the caveouts, if not this will need a input from Legal to resolve.
I wondered why I saw this but `licensecheck zlib` didn't complain. I've fixed Zlib. I also looked closer at glad and it's dual licensed CC0-1.0 AND Apache-2.0. I've updated this in the spec.
%{_datarootdir}/metainfo/io.github.wivrn.wivrn.metainfo.xml
You should validate this in %check per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/ #_app_data_validate_usage
Resolved.
Spec URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/imrsv/wivrn.spec SRPM URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/imrsv/wivrn-0.22-1.20241206gitv0.22.fc40/w...