[Bug 996489] Review Request: rubygem-tins - Useful tools library in Ruby

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996489

--- Comment #7 from Axilleas Pipinellis  ---
A(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6)
> > > 3, Should the license be "X11 or MIT" (taken from the README)? Since only
> > > MIT is included as a standalone file and in the .gemspec, it's probably
> > > better to list only MIT. Maybe you can ask upstream for clarification?
> >
> > I filled an issue: https://github.com/flori/tins/issues/5
>
> They are the same license, MIT for is the right one for Fedora.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Software_License_List

Anyhow, the author was kind enough to release a 0.8.4 version, which clarifies
the license :)