Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144
--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-26 21:59:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10)
Surprise, surprise! I got an answer in short time and the head developer (Fred) replied that he was under the impression that everything is already licensed under ASL 2.0 (for both packages). He said, that if I provide him a list with the files with a different license he'll happily change those to ASL 2.0.
Thanks you for feedback. I will post on this bug the list of the files which needs license change.