Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679980
--- Comment #5 from Al Reay alreay1@gmail.com 2011-03-02 18:25:03 EST --- Hi guys, thanks for the advice.
I've actually made a new build of the software with all filesystem objects renamed to 'octopuslb' instead of just 'octopus'. I don't want to deal with the binaries being called one thing when using RPM files and other when using the source tar.gz.
I've added my real name to bugzilla, removed the explicit requires, autoconf from buildrequires, and the INSTALL file is no longer bundled with the RPM
Here are the current SPEC and SRPM files. Neither has any rpmlint errors or warnings.
http://octopuslb.sourceforge.net/octopuslb.spec http://octopuslb.sourceforge.net/octopuslb-1.11-1.fc13.src.rpm