https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119830
--- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski dominik@greysector.net --- (In reply to Kalvin McCallum from comment #5)
Package Review
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_devel_packages
I wrote that already in comment #2.
===== MUST items =====
C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables.
Your review contains many entries which require manual review but are not marked with pass/fail/not-applicable. Please fill the unchecked boxes to make a complete review if you intend to take it up officially.