https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269603
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@in.waw.pl Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |zbyszek@in.waw.pl Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- Please link to the raw spec file. Otherwise fedora-review doesn't work ootb.
Yep, looks good. The %description is kind of hard to parse, but I don't use vim, maybe it would make sense if I did. I think you should change the Summary to be something like "Comment stuff out in vim using ...".
- license is OK - license file is not present, but that's fine for a 35 line script that uses a common license :)
- requires/provides are ok - appdata file is present, nice! - scriptlets are ok - latest version - fedora-review doesn't complain - rpmlint:
vim-commentary.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcc -> cc, g cc vim-commentary.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gc -> cg, g, c vim-commentary.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gcap -> gap, cap, g cap All OK.
vim-commentary.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3695 HTTP Error 503: Service Unavailable Works for me.
Package is APPROVED.