https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317939
--- Comment #4 from Benji Wiebe benjiwiebe14@gmail.com --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
But %description should be a bit longer: what can you do with this package, what is the output, is special hardware required, etc. Doesn't have to be exhaustive, one paragraph is enough.
It is a *bit* longer...I hope that's good enough.
During review it is customary to bump the revision after major changes, add stuff to %changelog, and upload the SRPM under a new name. The spec file is updated in place.
OK, I'll do that from now on.
I meant rpm package ownership. Your package creates those directories so it should own them.
Aha, I caught on about RPM ownership. I uninstalled dump1090 on my PC, and the directories are still there. I fixed that now.
Hm, I don't remember what those were. That's why it's helpful to keep old srpms accessible.
They were rtl-sdr and libusb. Both are picked up automatically by RPM.