https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824
--- Comment #10 from Luis Segundo <luis(a)blackfile.net> ---
(In reply to Casper Meijn from comment #9)
The "LICENSE.txt" is not the license under which we want to
use the
software. Is it then still necessary to include it?
I understand, if the license
does not apply, it can be removed.
I replaced %{_datarootdir} by %{_datadir}.
Nice!
please check this last issue
Issues:
=======
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file license.cpp is not marked as %license
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component