https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945159
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- License: LGPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and BSD and MIT and ASL 2.0 and MPLv2.0 and zlib # Rizin as a package is targeting to be licensed/compiled as LGPLv3+ # however during build for Fedora the GPL code is not omitted so effectively it # is GPLv2+.
Please be aware that the License field describes the binary package, not the sources [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#Does_the_License:_tag_cover_the...]. And if sources with "permissive" licenses are mixed with GPL in a single binary, then the effective license is most likely GPLv2. So maybe this license list can be simplified?