Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura tomspur@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-02 05:32:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
Ping?
Pong. Thanks for the ping!!
There are some rpmlint warnings (just posting the relevant ones, which are not ignorable): python-pebl.src:56: W: macro-in-comment %check python-pebl.src:57: W: macro-in-comment %{__python}
-> ignorable, because they remind you to add %check again
python-pebl.src:61: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot} python-pebl.src:62: W: macro-in-comment %{python_sitelib}
-> Better prefix an %, so this won't show up anymore
python-pebl.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_network.so _network.so()(64bit) python-pebl.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_cpd.so _cpd.so()(64bit)
-> A solution for this is e.g. in bug 537983 comment 27.
python-pebl.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_network.so python-pebl.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/_cpd.so
This is a bit strange... Do you have a debuginfo package? I'm wondering, why there isn't one here...
There is /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pebl/test/ Is that needed at runtime? If not, it would be nice, if you'd delete that (or ask upstream to do so).