Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pydotconf - python parser for dot.conf file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454921
------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant@gmail.com 2008-07-18 04:57 EST ------- Hi Mamoru,
Thanks for the review.
Package Updated.
SPEC URL : http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/python-dotconf/rpm/python-dotconf.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/python-dotconf/rpm/python-dotconf-0.2-...
(In reply to comment #7)
BTW
- Your latest package does not build on dist-f9-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=722566 egg info is created on F-9/devel (I forgot for F-8)
It just did not strike me to scratch build on koji myself.
dist-f9 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723978
dist-f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723983
dist-f8 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723982
dist-olpc3 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723985
- Currently all branches are >= F-8 and %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 is of no sense (unless you are thinking of OLPC branch)
Yes I will be requesting an OLPC branch. However I have fixed it as follows
%if 1%{?olpc} BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel %else BuildRequires: python-setuptools %endif
- Currently no issue (as they are same), however would you clarify this package is GPLv3 or GPLv3+?
Thanks for checking this up. The license should have been GPLv3+. I have fixed this now, however it will not be reflected in the SRPM built on koji scratch build. I have made the requisite fix in the SPEC that that I have uploaded.
Thanks