https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025084
Davide Cavalca dcavalca@fb.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(dcavalca@fb.com) |
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca dcavalca@fb.com ---
- should version be prefixed with 0^ ? Since it seems upstream uses YYYYMMDD snapshots. They might switch to a proper versioning scheme later on
I don't think so, it looks like upstream is using the date as their versioning policy (as sometimes they'll publish dotted snapshots too)
Should this package be ExclusiveArch: x86_64?
This package builds a number of ruby interpreters from source. I tested it on a aarch64 box and it works fine, so I don't think it needs ExclusiveArch