Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695022
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-10-29 14:30:08 EDT --- Though, thinking about it, if the headers say, LGPLv2+, and the website says LPGLv3, I would think you could just call it LGPLv3, include the license file, and be done with it. Block FE-LEGAL for review if you're not sure.