https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071646
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl --- Ah, the link is https://en.cppreference.com/w/Cppreference:FAQ#What_can_I_do_with_the_materi... Please add that in a comment in the spec file.
So this looks all good, but the license should *not* include MIT [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuideline...]:
The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the binary rpm.
I'd suggest %autorelease+%autochangelog to reduce the maintenance burden: https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/opting-in.html