[Bug 2161337] New: Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

Bug ID: 2161337
           Summary: Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing
                    stubs for dateutil
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
            Status: NEW
         Component: Package Review
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
        QA Contact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail]
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora

Spec URL:
https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-types-python-dateutil/python-type...
SRPM URL:
https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-types-python-dateutil/python-type...

Description:
This is a PEP 561 type stub package for the python-dateutil package. It can be
used by type-checking tools like mypy, PyCharm, pytype etc. to check code that
uses python-dateutil. The source for this package can be found at
https://github.com/python/typeshed/tree/main/stubs/python-dateutil. All fixes
for types and metadata should be contributed there.

See https://github.com/python/typeshed/blob/main/README.md for more details.
This package was generated from typeshed commit
bff43b53e50adf873c20faebb125a5fe808d4ad6.

Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

--- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96210656

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Kadlčík  ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5238133
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Whiteboard|                            |Trivial
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value
             Blocks|                            |1276941 (fedora-neuro)

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941
[Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

Ben Beasley  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley  ---
Is this a runtime dependency or a BuildRequires for testing? If it’s the
latter, you might be better patching out the typechecker from the tests
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_linters).

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

--- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
Ah, right. This one is BR for testing datalad locally. I'll take a look at
patching it out first.

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

--- Comment #5 from Ben Beasley  ---
I’m happy to review it if it’s not just for mypy. There are a few Python
libraries that use type information at runtime, although I bet this isn’t one
of those cases.

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

Neil Hanlon  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
           Assignee|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

--- Comment #6 from Neil Hanlon  ---
oops. I apologize, i didn't read the whole discussion before taking. Still
happy to take this as my first review if it is necessary.

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

Petr Pisar  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
              Flags|fedora-review?              |
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
        Last Closed|                            |2023-02-28 11:26:20

--- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
Sorry for the delay folks. This is indeed only a linting dep, so we won't
package it.

Neil, sorry about that. I have a couple of other reviews pending if you'd like
to take them up:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173665
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166009

[Bug 2161337] Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for dateutil

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161337

--- Comment #8 from Neil Hanlon  ---
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #7)
> Sorry for the delay folks. This is indeed only a linting dep, so we won't
> package it.
>
> Neil, sorry about that. I have a couple of other reviews pending if you'd
> like to take them up:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173665
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166009

Not a problem. I will take a look and see if I might be able to take one of
them on with my current workload.

Thank you!