Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: Django-loki - Web interface to manage buildbots
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
Summary: Review Request: Django-loki - Web interface to manage buildbots Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dradez@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://radez.fedorapeople.org/loki.spec SRPM URL: http://radez.fedorapeople.org/Django-loki-0.7.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A django interface to managagine buildbots
This is my first package and I need a sponsor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
Dan Radez dradez@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
Anderson Silva ansilva@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ansilva@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Anderson Silva ansilva@redhat.com 2010-07-14 14:07:43 EDT --- Django-reusable-base requirement isn't a fedora package it seems, at least it is not found when I try to do a yum install on it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
--- Comment #2 from Dan Radez dradez@redhat.com 2010-07-14 14:17:52 EDT --- working with a sponsor in person. updated a few things in teh spec. updated comments, and requires
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
--- Comment #3 from Anderson Silva ansilva@redhat.com 2010-07-14 14:36:29 EDT --- it passes rpm lint, but building the rpm fails with:
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/remote/ansilva/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/Django-loki-0.7.2-1.fc13.i386 error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django_loki-0.7.2-py2.6.egg-info
RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django_loki-0.7.2-py2.6.egg-info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
--- Comment #4 from Dan Radez dradez@redhat.com 2010-07-14 14:42:08 EDT --- updated spec, new srpm link: http://radez.fedorapeople.org/Django-loki-0.7.2-2.fc13.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
--- Comment #5 from Anderson Silva ansilva@redhat.com 2010-07-14 14:49:27 EDT --- spec and src looks reasonable.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
--- Comment #6 from Anderson Silva ansilva@redhat.com 2010-07-14 14:49:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5)
spec and src looks reasonable.
... look ...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
Anderson Silva ansilva@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
Anderson Silva ansilva@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
--- Comment #7 from Dan Radez dradez@redhat.com 2010-07-14 16:25:47 EDT --- Still need a sponsor for this. Anderson was not able to sponsor me after all. We're learning how sponsorship works :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
Marek Mahut mmahut@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut@redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mmahut@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin@tummy.com
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-07-15 15:37:21 EDT --- Hey Dan. ;)
Some general comments here before a full review:
- Take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored If you have some more packages to submit and/or wish to do some 'pre reviews' of other pending reviews to show you know the guidelines, that would be great.
- Your spec file should match the package name. Please make sure it's "Django-loki.spec" and not just "loki.spec"
- Please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs about the egg files. You shouldn't ghost them, but should provide them. Also, might check over the main python guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
Please update those things and I will look at doing a formal review. ;)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
--- Comment #9 from Dan Radez dradez@redhat.com 2010-07-16 09:58:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://radez.fedorapeople.org/Django-loki.spec SRPM URL: http://radez.fedorapeople.org/Django-loki-0.7.2-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: A django interface to managaing buildbots
updated this info.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
--- Comment #10 from Dan Radez dradez@redhat.com 2010-07-16 10:15:16 EDT --- Kevin, The updates have been made as requested. I do have one other package to submit. I'll get this one ready too and work through some pre reviews.
Thanks
Dan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-07-17 00:04:25 EDT --- Marek: Were you going to review this and look at sponsoring Dan?
I'd be happy to do so, or you can... I didn't note that you had assigned the review already. :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
Kevin Kofler kevin@tigcc.ticalc.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614541
Dan Radez dradez@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2011-11-09 09:24:10
--- Comment #12 from Dan Radez dradez@redhat.com 2011-11-09 09:24:10 EST --- not going to continue trying to package this
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org