Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: rnorwood@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Frontier-RPC/ Initial Owner: rnorwood@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From panemade@gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:27 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)you may like to keep simple disttag as "2%{dist}" only.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
------- Additional Comments From rnorwood@redhat.com 2007-10-26 16:01 EST ------- All issues should be fixed in new version: perl-Frotnier-RPC-0.07b4-3.fc9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide
mastahnke@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From mastahnke@gmail.com 2008-07-11 22:27 EST ------- Can we please branch this for EPEL? I emailed the primary maintainer on June 18 and got response. It's now July 11. I will offer co-maintainership in EPEL. If this is the wrong bug for this type of request, sorry. I looked but didn't see much.
Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Frontier-RPC Short Description: A Perl interface for making and serving XML-RPC calls Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4, EL5 InitialCC: kasal 'Štěpán Kasal' skasal@redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
------- Additional Comments From mastahnke@gmail.com 2008-07-11 22:29 EST ------- That should have said "got no response"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-07-11 23:47 EST ------- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
paul@city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy@redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From paul@city-fan.org 2008-07-14 11:24 EST ------- *** Bug 455266 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
Lubomir Rintel lkundrak@v3.sk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lkundrak@v3.sk Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-07-17 15:18:01 EDT --- I can't see that this merge review was ever approved; I'm not sure why it's now closed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
Adam Goode adam@spicenitz.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |adam@spicenitz.org Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mmaslano@redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2010-01-05 10:31:16 EDT --- OK rpmlint on every package. OK name of package accords to the Naming Guidelines. OK spec file name match the base package %{name}. OK package meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK package has a good license. OK spec file is written in American English. OK spec file for the package must be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK successful koji compilation. OK correct BuildRequires, Requires. OK proper use of %find_lang macro. OK shared library must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK relocatable package must state this fact. OK package must own their directories. OK permissions on files must be set properly. OK %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK consistent use of macros. OK package contains code, or permissable content. OK large documentation go in a -doc subpackage. OK %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. OK header files must be in a -devel package. OK static libraries must be in a -static package. OK pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK library files with a suffix (.so) must go in -devel. OK usually devel packages must require the base package. OK Remove .la libtool archives. OK GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK %install section starts with rm -rf %{buildroot}.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #9 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2010-01-22 06:20:46 EST --- There's no owner. I'm closing it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppisar@redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com 2011-07-26 04:17:55 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Frontier-RPC Branches: f14 f15 New InitialCC: perl-sig
Please add `perl-sig' pseudo-user to InitialCC group for all Fedora branches. This cannot be done by maintainer through pkgdb interface.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-07-26 08:01:18 EDT --- InitialCC only works at branch creation. I don't see a way for me to add perl-sig in pkgdb either.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger@gmail.com, | |limb@jcomserv.net
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-07-26 08:01:50 EDT --- Toshio, what's the best approach here?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
--- Comment #13 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.badger@gmail.com 2011-07-26 11:04:19 EDT --- This should be the commandline you need:
pkgdb-client edit -c perl-sig -b devel -b f14 -b f15 -b f16 perl-Frontier-RPC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-07-26 11:14:28 EDT --- [limb@bamboo ~]$ pkgdb-cli edit -c perl-sig -b devel -b f14 -b f15 -b f16 perl-Frontier-RPC
Error: command must be one of: acl,list,request,update,orphan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
--- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2011-07-26 11:25:31 EDT --- Toshio's command should work as he indicated. "pkgdb-client", not "pkgdb-cli".
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-07-26 11:38:51 EDT --- [limb@bamboo ~]$ pkgdb-client edit -c perl-sig -b devel -b f14 -b f15 -b f16 perl-Frontier-RPC bash: pkgdb-client: command not found... [limb@bamboo ~]$ rpm -ql packagedb-cli /usr/bin/pkgdb-cli /usr/share/doc/packagedb-cli-1.0.0 /usr/share/doc/packagedb-cli-1.0.0/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/packagedb-cli-1.0.0/README [limb@bamboo ~]$ sudo yum install /usr/bin/pkgdb-client Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Install Process No package /usr/bin/pkgdb-client available. Error: Nothing to do [limb@bamboo ~]$
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
--- Comment #17 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.badger@gmail.com 2011-07-26 15:54:39 EDT --- You can find pkgdb-client on pkgs01.fedoraproject.org or in the infrastructure repository fedora-packagedb-client.
I've talked with pingou about merging the admin functions in pkgdb-client into pkgdb-cli and we might do that in the future.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-07-26 16:06:18 EDT --- Ok, thanks. Done.
That would be great. Thanks!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-07-26 16:07:03 EDT --- Petr, if you can email me the other packages this needs done for, I'll do those as well.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org