Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo@di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec
SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Module-ScanDeps-0.59-1.src....
Description: An application of Module::ScanDeps is to generate executables from scripts that contains necessary modules; this module supports two such projects, PAR and App::Packer. Please see their respective documentations on CPAN for further information.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
jpo@di.uminho.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve@silug.org
------- Additional Comments From jpo@di.uminho.pt 2006-05-06 17:31 EST ------- *** Bug 190935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
jpo@di.uminho.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190937 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info |tibbs@math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2006-05-07 16:28 EST ------- The source URL seems wrong (or at least I can't fetch the upstream source from there). I could get it from: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SM/SMUELLER/Module-ScanDeps-0.59.ta... which I'll assume is the correct upstream.
The module puts an executable with a .pl extension into bindir. I agree with Steve that this is a bit ugly but as far as I know it's not a blocker. (My own denyhosts package drops denyhosts.py into bindir so I can't really complain.)
Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 6e20e368ff101d8bc8f31eaa2d81c264 Module-ScanDeps-0.59.tar.gz 6e20e368ff101d8bc8f31eaa2d81c264 Module-ScanDeps-0.59.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=20, 2 wallclock secs ( 2.38 cusr + 0.32 csys = 2.70 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app.
APPROVED, but please double check the source URL and fix if necessary.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
------- Additional Comments From jpo@di.uminho.pt 2006-05-07 17:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2)
The source URL seems wrong (or at least I can't fetch the upstream source from there). I could get it from: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SM/SMUELLER/Module-ScanDeps-0.59.ta... which I'll assume is the correct upstream.
I failed to catch the change of the maintainer. I will correct the URL after importing it. Thanks.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
jpo@di.uminho.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From jpo@di.uminho.pt 2006-05-08 17:04 EST ------- Thanks for the review.
Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
steve@silug.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From steve@silug.org 2007-12-18 15:29 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Module-ScanDeps New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2007-12-18 21:12 EST ------- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bochecha@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #7 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-19 04:15:54 EST --- This package is in EPEL5, but not in EPEL6. Is there any reason for that?
I would like to see this package in EPEL6, and I am willing to help co-maintain it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190582
--- Comment #8 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-19 04:41:10 EST --- Nevermind, I just saw it's in the RHEL6 Client repository (I was only looking at the Server one).
Sorry for the spam.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org