Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: rnorwood@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/perl-Net-IP/ Initial Owner: rnorwood@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |rnorwood@redhat.com CC| |ville.skytta@iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@iki.fi 2007-02-04 11:08 EST ------- Just a couple of small issues that can be fixed directly in CVS, no need for a review roundtrip:
- Source URL is broken (missing slash), should be "ftp://cpan...", not "ftp:/cpan..."
- Change "-type d -depth" to "-depth -type d" in %install to avoid a (discarded) warning from find(1).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
------- Additional Comments From rnorwood@redhat.com 2007-02-04 13:28 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Ville.
I noticed a couple of other things that I fixed as well:
o rpmlint complained about mixed-spaces-and-tabs. Fixed.
o Removed the redundant BuildRequires: perl
o Fixed the Release: to include magic %{?dist} macro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
------- Additional Comments From rnorwood@redhat.com 2007-02-04 13:41 EST ------- Built new package for FC7. Let me know what you think.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
rnorwood@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rnorwood@redhat.com |ville.skytta@iki.fi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@iki.fi 2007-02-05 14:41 EST ------- Looks good, although even if currently redundant with today's specified minimal Fedora buildroot package lists, I would have kept the perl build dependency (I don't expect it to stick around in the list of "assumed present" packages forever). But that's just a personal preference.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
rnorwood@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ville.skytta@iki.fi |rnorwood@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From mmaslano@redhat.com 2008-06-02 06:47 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Net-IP New Branches: EL-4 Updated EPEL Owners: kasal mmaslano Updated EPEL CC: perl-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-IP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-06-02 11:27 EST ------- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2009-02-26 18:40:08 EDT --- Closing... (merge review with fedora-review+)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bochecha@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #8 from Mathieu Bridon bochecha@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-19 04:16:41 EST --- This package is in EPEL4, but not in EPEL5 and 6. Is there any reason for that?
I would like to see this package in EPEL6, and I am willing to help co-maintain it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226271
--- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.de 2011-01-19 04:30:38 EST --- Because the package is in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org