3:47 a.m.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version
of ncurses gem
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: sgupta(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Spec URL:
http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw.spec
SRPM URL:
http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw-1.2...
Description: Hacked up version of ncurses gem that supports wide characters and
ruby1.9.1. Original ncurses gem by t-peters(a)users.berlios.de. Spec and SRPM
built using gem2rpm utility.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:31 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Shreyank Gupta <sgupta(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:35 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #1 from Shreyank Gupta <sgupta(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-30 07:35:31 EDT ---
rpmlint output is :
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: no-soname
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/lib/ncursesw_bin.so
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ncursesw_bin.so
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/form_wrap.c
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Destroy_checker/destroyed%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/menu_wrap.h
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Menu/MENU/user_object%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/menu_wrap.c
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/panel_wrap.c
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Form/FORM/user_object%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ncurses_wrap.c
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/form_wrap.h
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ncurses_wrap.h
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Menu/ITEM/user_object%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/Form/FIELD/user_object%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ri/Ncurses/WINDOW/respond_to%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-ncursesw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/panel_wrap.h
---
1. Do I split the the files into a devel subpackage?
2. How do i solve the 'unstripped-binary-or-object' problem?
---
koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2217882
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:58 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #2 from Shreyank Gupta <sgupta(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-31 10:58:16 EDT ---
Updated spec and srpm, replaced %define with %global
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:19 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-05-31 14:19:22
EDT ---
Some notes:
Please also address the issue I wrote on bug 598138.
Then:
* Summary
- Is "and ruby 1.9.1" part needed for Summary? (even if
we move to ruby 1.9.x on F-14, I don't think this part
is needed).
* License
- The license tag for this package should be "LGPLv2+".
* Unneeded files
- *.c, *.h files are for source files for C extension .so file,
*.o binary files are used for generating the file.
Also "extconf.rb" is like configure, and "mkmf.log" is like
config.log.
These files are not needed on runtime and should not be packaged
into binary rpm.
* Arch dependent binary file
- C extension .so file is arch-dependent and must be moved
to under %ruby_sitearch
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Build_Architecture_and_File...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:04 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #4 from Shreyank Gupta <sgupta(a)redhat.com> 2010-06-01 12:04:49 EDT ---
UPDATED:
--------
Spec URL:
http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw.spec
SRPM URL:
http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw-1.2...
Notes/doubts:
------
* Removed 'and ruby 1.9.1' from the summary.
* rm -f all .c .o and .h files as I was not sure whether to %exclude it or not.
* There are two .so files, one inside and one outside the lib directory. Put
the lib one inside ruby_sitearch and removed the other one.
* Added examples as a part of the -docs subpackage. Is that the right thing to
do?
Koji scratch build:
-------------------
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2222741
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:41 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-01 14:41:06
EDT ---
For -2:
* For
- Directory ownership of %geminstdir, %gemdir/doc,
and "Changes THANKS TODO VERSION", please my comments
on bug 598138.
* Examples
- For example,
-------------------------------------------------------
$ ruby -rubygems ./examples/tclock.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
`gem_original_require': no such file to load -- ncurses (LoadError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
from ./examples/tclock.rb:33
-------------------------------------------------------
Actually these example files (in -doc subpackage) all has
'require ncurses(.rb)', however actually the installed ruby
script (in main package) is "ncursesw.rb".
So these example files should be modified as such (I am not sure
if we can create symlink as "ncurses.rb -> ncursesw.rb", because
there is another "ncurses-0.9.1.gem" actually - although ncurses.gem
seems the older version of ncursesw.gem)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:56 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #6 from Shreyank Gupta <sgupta(a)redhat.com> 2010-06-02 08:56:09 EDT ---
UPDATED:
--------
Spec URL:
http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw.spec
SRPM URL:
http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw-1.2...
Notes:
------
I ran sed and replaced all require 'ncurses' to require 'ncursesw'.
HTH
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:26 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-03 04:26:18
EDT ---
(removing NEEDSPONSOR)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:49 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Shreyank Gupta <shreyankg(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |shreyankg(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Shreyank Gupta <shreyankg(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-03 10:49:30 EDT
---
Koji Scratch build:
--------------------
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2227505
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:36 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-03 15:36:38
EDT ---
2 issues
* rpmlint issue for -debuginfo rpm related
--------------------------------------------------------------
rubygem-ncursesw-debuginfo.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/rubygem-ncursesw-1.2.4.1/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/ncurses_wrap.c
rubygem-ncursesw-debuginfo.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/rubygem-ncursesw-1.2.4.1/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ncursesw-1.2.4.1/panel_wrap.h
--------------------------------------------------------------
- To avoid this rpmlint complaint, please add below at the end
of %build:
--------------------------------------------------------------
pushd ./%{geminstdir}
chmod 0644 *.h *.c
popd
--------------------------------------------------------------
* License
- Please change the license tag on -doc subpacakge to
"LGPLv2+ and LDPL"
ref:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2010-June/001290.html
Please fix the above issue when importing this package into
Fedora CVS.
--------------------------------------------------------------
This package (rubygem-ncursesw) is APPROVED by mtasaka
--------------------------------------------------------------
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:18 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #10 from Shreyank Gupta <shreyankg(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-04 08:18:13 EDT
---
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-ncursesw
Short Description: Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Owners: shreyankg
Branches: F-13
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:45 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #11 from Shreyank Gupta <shreyankg(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-04 08:45:18 EDT
---
UPDATED:
--------
Spec URL:
http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw.spec
SRPM URL:
http://shreyankg.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ncursesw/rubygem-ncursesw-1.2...
Notes:
------
rpmlint gives the following warning on the -doc rpm:
W: invalid-license LDPL
So I filed bug #600317 with rpmlint to correct it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:07 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-04 10:07:49
EDT ---
Please set fedora-cvs flag to ?.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:21 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Shreyank Gupta <shreyankg(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:21 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #13 from Shreyank Gupta <shreyankg(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-04 10:21:39 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #12)
Please set fedora-cvs flag to ?.
I'm sorry! :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:50 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? |fedora-review?
--- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-04 13:50:50
EDT ---
Ah... sorry, wait.
I just noticed that Fedora already includes ruby-ncurses and
the upstream of both ruby-ncurses and rubygem-ncursesw is the same.
Would you first contact ruby-ncurses's maintainer to discuss
which should be kept in Fedora distrubution?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:52 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-04 13:52:07
EDT ---
ref:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-ncurses
maintainer: slukasik _at_ redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:53 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #16 from Shreyank Gupta <shreyankg(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-07 05:53:02 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #14)
Ah... sorry, wait.
I just noticed that Fedora already includes ruby-ncurses and
the upstream of both ruby-ncurses and rubygem-ncursesw is the same.
The point of filing a rewiew request for rubygem-ncursesw is that it is one of
the dependencies for sup 0.10.2 (http://rubyforge.org/projects/sup/), which I
want to package for Fedora, but cannot do so until all its dependencies are in
Fedora.
The thing is the latest development version of sup (0.11) uses ruby-ncurses,
but that is quite unstable.
Since rubygem-ncursesw is required for sup-0.10.2 I would like it packaged
temporarily, and I would obsolete this package once I package sup-0.11
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:43 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-07 11:43:42
EDT ---
Well, if currently you are only considering of importing packages
which sup depends on, and under the current condition that
ruby-ncurses is already in Fedora, then this package is not needed
even for 0.10.2 (as far I checked the source code)
For example sup-0.10.2/bin/sup contains:
-------------------------------------------------------
5 no_ncursesw = false
6 begin
7 require 'ncursesw'
8 rescue LoadError
9 require 'ncurses'
10 no_ncursesw = true
11 end
-------------------------------------------------------
so sup falls back to using ncurses if ncursesw is not found.
So if you are not interested in maintaining ncursesw once
sup 0.11 is released, currently I am against importing this
package into Fedora.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:03 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
--- Comment #18 from Shreyank Gupta <shreyankg(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-07 13:03:45 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #17)
[..]
So if you are not interested in maintaining ncursesw once
sup 0.11 is released, currently I am against importing this
package into Fedora.
Alright then, I guess we can close this request unless required later.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:53 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-07 13:53:21
EDT ---
Okay, once closing as I think even sup-0.10.2 does not require
ncursesw (provided that ruby-ncurses is available).
If it is found that this package is needed, please reopen this bug
(or file a new review request).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5124
days inactive
5132
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
21 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla