Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721
Summary: Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/gprof2dot.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/gprof2dot-1.0-0.1.20090901svn.fc11.s... Description: This is a Python script to convert the output from prof, gprof, oprofile, Shark, AQtime, and python profilers into a dot graph. It has the following features:
* can correctly parse C++ template function names * allows to prune nodes and edges below a certain threshold * uses an heuristic to propagate time inside mutually recursive functions * uses color efficiently to draw attention to hot-spots
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |tibbs@math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-09-10 01:06:08 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent.
Generally I'd recommend using svn export instead of svn checkout as the latter generates .svn directories which aren't useful for a tarball release. Not a huge deal, of course.
I'm not sure the test suite does much of anything. I guess it shows that the program doesn't die, but without a set of expected data it has nothing to compare the generated output against.
Looks good to me.
* source files match upstream (compared manually after following checkout instructions) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: gprof2dot = 1.0-0.1.20090901svn.fc12 = /usr/bin/env python
* %check is present and the test run at least doesn't crash. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content.
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.badger@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.badger@gmail.com 2009-09-14 20:59:25 EDT --- I will change svn checkout => svn export before build as well.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gprof2dot Short Description: Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers Owners: toshio Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721
Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us 2009-09-14 21:19:33 EDT --- CVS Done
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-15 21:18:13 EDT --- gprof2dot-1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gprof2dot-1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-16 16:35:12 EDT --- gprof2dot-1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gprof2dot'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9683
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-03 14:53:19 EDT --- gprof2dot-1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org