Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578
Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-database - database plugin for monodevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monodevelop-database.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monodevelop-database-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: monodevelop-database is a database plugin for monodevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-database - database plugin for monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578
gnomeuser@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |444721 Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser@gmail.com 2008-05-07 06:57 EST ------- Fails to build in mock: autoreconf: command not found Also needs to depend on gtksourceview-sharp-2.0 (blocking on 444721)
You need the standard ExclusiveArch line for Mono apps: ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparc alpha ppc
As the package contains absolutely no .boo files, I wonder why this requires boo in the first place.
Tarball contains prebuilt .dll files /contrib/MySql/MySql.Data.dll /contrib/Sqlite/Mono.Data.Sqlite.dll
The package doesn't currently build without these however we are not allowed to use prebuilt stuff for security reasons.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-database - database plugin for monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578
Bug 443578 depends on bug 444721, which changed state.
Bug 444721 Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview2-sharp - gtksourceview2 C# binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444721
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-database - database plugin for monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578
------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser@gmail.com 2008-06-30 20:25 EST ------- Ping, it has been nearly 2 months now Paul. Again I offer any help you might need to hammer Mono into shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578
--- Comment #3 from Paul F. Johnson paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-10-20 07:58:27 EDT --- Unable to build due to problems with MD 1.9. This should be resolved in the next couple of weeks with MD 1.9 alpha 2's release.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578
--- Comment #4 from David Nielsen gnomeuser@gmail.com 2009-02-21 08:34:29 EDT --- With MD2 beta 1 out and Fedora now containing a new succesful build of MD are you still interested in this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578
David Nielsen dnielsen@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX
--- Comment #5 from David Nielsen dnielsen@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-28 05:56:11 EDT --- Due to inactivity since 2008-10-20 I am closing this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578
Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz elsupergomez@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |elsupergomez@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz elsupergomez@gmail.com 2010-06-11 08:17:10 EDT --- This is my first attempt to start becoming a packager. Any comment is welcome to learn I make changes to the file spec to work well, please check
Spec URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/monodevelop-database.spec SRPM URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/monodevelop-database-2.2-7.fc13.s...
RPM for x86_64: - http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/repo/monodevelop-database-2.2-7.fc13.x8... - http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/repo/monodevelop-database-devel-2.2-7.f...
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org