Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: maven-changelog-plugin - Maven Changelog Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
Summary: Review Request: maven-changelog-plugin - Maven Changelog Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huwang@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven_changelog_plugin/maven-changel... SRPM URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven_changelog_plugin/maven-changel... Description: Produce SCM changelog reports.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #1 from huwang huwang@redhat.com 2010-05-30 23:49:28 EDT --- Note about this package:
Built with dist-f14-maven221 target in koji, here is the link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2218736
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #2 from huwang huwang@redhat.com 2010-05-31 06:34:21 EDT --- Rebuilt in koji, the link is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2219103
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |guido.grazioli@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2010-05-31 06:46:37 EDT --- The rebuild is for maven-ant-plugin; while i'm reviewing, you could replace BuildRequire: maven2-plugin-plugin (which is obsoleted by maven-plugin-plugin)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2010-05-31 07:10:54 EDT --- NEEDSWORK - rpmlint output: maven-changelog-plugin.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog -2.2-1 ['2.2-1.fc14', '2.2-1'] - Please fix this one
maven-changelog-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-changelog-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-changelog-plugin maven-changelog-plugin.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: maven-changelog-plugin-2.2.tar.gz - These are false positives
OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - The package must meet the Java Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is ASL 2.0) NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2218736 (against dist-f14-maven221 target) OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. (exported from svn) NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros NA - The package must contain code, or permissable content (no content) NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release
OTHER: -Dmaven.test.skip=true you could comment on that, what is missing to complete tests.
Summary: could you be more descriptive? Think of a yum search: maven-changelog-plugin.noarch: Maven Changelog Plugin This would be better for instance: maven-changelog-plugin.noarch: Produce SCM changelog reports
Besides that, specfile is in good shape
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2010-05-31 07:52:24 EDT --- Two more things:
- the specfile posted above is not the same included in the SRPM - typo in changelog entry: "inital"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sochotni@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni@redhat.com 2010-05-31 10:29:43 EDT --- Also I believe your spec file is missing proper provides/obsoletes for old maven2-plugin-changelog.
Guido please verify this when doing reviews for new-style maven plugins. Thanks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #7 from huwang huwang@redhat.com 2010-06-01 03:36:58 EDT --- Fixed. Please review again, thanks.
About -Dmaven.test.skip=true: there is compilation failure in test, as class ScmBranchParameters doesn't exist in the maven-scm-1.2 which is depended by this package (class ScmBranchParameters exist in maven-scm-1.3, I think maybe it need to upgrade to 1.3), please see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2221188&name=build.log
Spec URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven_changelog_plugin/maven-changel... SRPM URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven_changelog_plugin/maven-changel...
scratch built in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2221636
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #8 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2010-06-01 05:01:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
Also I believe your spec file is missing proper provides/obsoletes for old maven2-plugin-changelog.
Guido please verify this when doing reviews for new-style maven plugins. Thanks
You absolutely right, i initially thought it was possible to have both maven versions installed, but thats not quite; i'm tracking back my past reviews to ensure those bits are added.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2010-06-01 17:17:16 EDT --- Package APPROVED. Please add the comment about the skipped tests in the specfile too, if you want.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #10 from huwang huwang@redhat.com 2010-06-01 22:49:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-changelog-plugin Short Description: Maven Changelog Plugin Owners: huwang Branches: InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
huwang huwang@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #11 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2010-06-02 05:10:01 EDT --- huwang, before you commit, can you also switch to xz compression?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #12 from huwang huwang@redhat.com 2010-06-02 05:47:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11)
huwang, before you commit, can you also switch to xz compression?
Thanks for your review.
There is no tar 2.x in RHEL, considering compatibility, I prefer to use bz2 compression.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-06-03 16:30:55 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
--- Comment #14 from huwang huwang@redhat.com 2010-06-04 05:38:07 EDT --- Built in kojiļ¼ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=176584
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597937
huwang huwang@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org