Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum Alias: yum-rhn-plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
Summary: Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.2-1.src.rp...
Description: This yum plugin provides support for yum to access a Red Hat Network server for software updates.
rpmlint is silent
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1703680
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-26 13:44:16 EDT --- Hi,
Source Url is missing. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for how to deal with this.
rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Not sure if "rpmlint is silent" counts here :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
--- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us 2009-09-27 11:40:45 EDT --- Obsoletes: up2date < 5.0.0 Provides: up2date = %{version} this is wrong sinve version is less that what is obsoleted
the Provides should be 5.0.0
%files section should be much cleaner
%clean should just be rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2009-09-29 02:43:05 EDT --- Updated. SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1.src.rp...
I addressed comment #1 and #2, but "%files section should be much cleaner". Not should what you exactly mean Dennis. Seem sane to me.
rpmlint is silent: [msuchy@dri/~/rhn/spacewalk.pub/client/rhel/yum-rhn-plugin]$ rpmlint /tmp/spacewalk-build/rpmbuild-yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [msuchy@dri/~/rhn/spacewalk.pub/client/rhel/yum-rhn-plugin]$ rpmlint /tmp/spacewalk-build/rpmbuild-yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1/noarch/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-29 04:30:23 EDT --- "%files section should be much cleaner" like:
%{_mandir}/man*/* %{_datadir}/yum-plugins/* %{_datadir}/rhn/*/*
I'm not sure if there's a new version out. If not, you're supposed to bump the release, not the version. Well if you're the developer, i guess it's up to you then. I can only guess since there's no README, AUTHORS, COPYING in the source tarball.
Would be nice if you do a koji --scratch run and post the Task-info link in here. koji build --scratch dist-f12 path/to/srpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-29 04:33:39 EDT --- Erm.. Sorry, the scratch build is already there. /me seems to need glasses.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
--- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2009-09-29 04:51:39 EDT --- Updated. SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.4-1.src.rp...
I bumped version (and not release), because I'm one of the Spacewalk developers and I made the change in upstream and released new version of this package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-29 05:43:54 EDT --- Heh, took me a while to find the reason for the version bump. You make it because you include the spec file in the tarball. Interesting. The spec is anyways in the SRPM but i think you have your reason to keep a copy in the tarball.
So, if it's fine to have a package without a license copy, then i cant find anything further.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
--- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2009-09-30 03:30:03 EDT --- Yeah, it is "feature" of our release system. But otherwise it is really easy to work with.
Inclusion of license copy is "only" SHOULD item. But if you give me big plus in flag I'll give you LICENSE file :)
SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.5-1.src.rp...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |thomasj@fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-30 06:24:45 EDT --- Approved
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #10 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2009-09-30 07:45:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yum-rhn-plugin Short Description: RHN support for yum Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-09-30 19:08:23 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-01 01:48:26 EDT --- Found one last thing. You have a single comment in your source code "Distributed under GPL" (in packages.py). Could you change that to what you reference in the spec file "GPLv2". Thanks.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453
Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #13 from Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com 2009-10-01 03:30:34 EDT --- Good catch. Changed.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org