Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503
Summary: Merge Review: tree Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: twaugh@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: tree
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/tree/ Initial Owner: twaugh@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503
ruben@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ruben@rubenkerkhof.com Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503
ruben@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ruben@rubenkerkhof.com |twaugh@redhat.com CC| |ruben@rubenkerkhof.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
------- Additional Comments From ruben@rubenkerkhof.com 2007-02-04 11:25 EST ------- Hi there,
Review for release 5: * RPM name is OK * Source tree-1.5.0.tgz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK
Needs work: * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * Package is marked as relocatable, please check. (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#RelocatablePackages) * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) Just add LICENSE from the source to %doc * Preserve timestamps when you install files
Rpmlint is not silent:
Source RPM: W: tree summary-ended-with-dot A utility which displays a tree view of the contents of directories. W: tree hardcoded-prefix-tag /usr W: tree hardcoded-path-in-buildroot-tag /var/tmp/tree-root
rpmlint of tree: W: tree summary-ended-with-dot A utility which displays a tree view of the contents of directories.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503
ruben@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503
twaugh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|twaugh@redhat.com |ruben@rubenkerkhof.com Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From twaugh@redhat.com 2007-02-06 12:09 EST ------- Thanks! Should be all fixed in 1.5.0-6.fc7.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503
ruben@rubenkerkhof.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ruben@rubenkerkhof.com |twaugh@redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From ruben@rubenkerkhof.com 2007-02-06 14:54 EST ------- Thanks Tim, this looks good. One question though, why do you rm -rf tree in %build? I think rpmbuild does this by default.
I don't see any blockers, so this package is approved. Please leave the ticket assigned to yourself.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503
------- Additional Comments From twaugh@redhat.com 2007-02-07 04:57 EST ------- A previous tarball shipped the tree binary(!) along with the source. Current version doesn't do that so I'll remove the rm.
Thanks!
Can I set the resolution to 'RAWHIDE' or something?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503
------- Additional Comments From ruben@rubenkerkhof.com 2007-02-07 07:27 EST ------- If you want, you can set it to closed rawhide. We're only planning on looking at the fedora-review flag. If that's a +, the package is approved.
Thanks,
Ruben
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226503
twaugh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org