[Bug 507585] New: Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Summary: Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-psi.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-psi-0.3b1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: psi is a Python module providing direct access to real-time system and process information.
Did a successful scratch build in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1431763
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Rahul Sundaram sundaram@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram@redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |sundaram@redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa@fedoraproject.org |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2009-07-03 14:52:34 EDT --- Rahul: if you're reviewing this, please set the bug status to assigned and change the fedora-review tag to ?.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov@gmail.com AssignedTo|sundaram@redhat.com |lemenkov@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2009-10-01 07:40:34 EDT --- It seems, that Rahul quite busy now, so I'll review it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2009-10-05 09:52:41 EDT --- REVIEW:
+ rpmlint is silent
[petro@Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/python-psi-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro@Sulaco SPECS]$
- The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. However I found two possible issues - it looks like this is a pre-release package, so it probably should be versioned as 0.3.1-0.%{release}.b1, however I'm not sure. The second possible issue is the capitalization of name - perhaps, it would be better to name it as python-PSI.
- Please, use %global instead of %define in the very first line of spec.
- Please, consider adding examples as %doc
+ Otherwise, the package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.
[petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum PSI-0.3b1.1.tar.gz* 80a3c917f108e500e1c4381e81dfb4cb42cfa504a3bef69fc6c34144ced3b744 PSI-0.3b1.1.tar.gz 80a3c917f108e500e1c4381e81dfb4cb42cfa504a3bef69fc6c34144ced3b744 PSI-0.3b1.1.tar.gz.1 [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files were set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
Please, comment/fix issues, mentioned above, and I'll continue.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kushaldas@gmail.c | |om)
--- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2009-10-13 08:06:41 EDT --- Ping!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2009-10-23 05:59:23 EDT --- Ping, again.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2009-11-02 01:45:31 EDT --- Ping, again!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Kushal Das kushaldas@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kushaldas@gmail.c | |om) |
--- Comment #7 from Kushal Das kushaldas@gmail.com 2009-11-02 01:54:00 EDT --- Sorry for the vanishing act. My main system was broken but now back alive, will look into this within few hours.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2010-03-15 08:11:52 EDT --- Any news?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Colin Kissa andrew@topdog.za.net 2010-03-15 08:24:32 EDT ---
Kushal, i can setup in and submit if you are too busy to get to this, i need this for a project am working on.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #10 from Kushal Das kushaldas@gmail.com 2010-03-18 07:48:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9)
Kushal, i can setup in and submit if you are too busy to get to this, i need this for a project am working on.
Please go ahead on this, I am really sorry for not updating on time :(
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Colin Kissa andrew@topdog.za.net 2010-03-18 09:39:43 EDT ---
Okay i will submit a fixed spec later today.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Colin Kissa andrew@topdog.za.net 2010-03-18 10:11:28 EDT ---
Updated spec and srpm.
http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/python-PSI/python-PSI.spec http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/python-PSI/python-PSI-0.3-0....
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2010-03-25 07:24:51 EDT --- Ok, all issues were addressed, so here is the rest of my review:
+ rpmlint is silent:
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/python-PSI-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
+ Sources matches upstream:
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum PSI-0.3b2.tar.gz* 40cafe588746191294c46d8cfb010921f66294cf73b55690e412040de0aabb05 PSI-0.3b2.tar.gz 40cafe588746191294c46d8cfb010921f66294cf73b55690e412040de0aabb05 PSI-0.3b2.tar.gz.1 Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES:
This package is
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python-psi |Review Request: python-PSI |- Shows real time system |- Shows real time system |information in python |information in python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Andrew Colin Kissa andrew@topdog.za.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Colin Kissa andrew@topdog.za.net 2010-03-25 07:29:40 EDT ---
Thanks Peter, for the review.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-PSI Short Description: summary of package Owners: topdog Branches: F-11 F-12 F-13 EL-5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #15 from Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us 2010-03-25 16:54:30 EDT --- CVS Done
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-26 03:31:38 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.el5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-26 03:31:44 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-26 03:31:48 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-26 03:31:53 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-26 20:54:33 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-PSI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-26 21:00:07 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-PSI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-26 22:31:19 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-PSI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.el5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-01 15:31:42 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-PSI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-12 21:47:02 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-12 21:51:33 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc13 |python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-12 21:53:39 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc11 |python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.fc12 |python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.el5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-04-15 11:49:14 EDT --- python-PSI-0.3-0.1.b2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla