https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517
--- Comment #18 from sanford rockowitz <rockowitz(a)minsoft.com> ---
Actually, I was surprised to receive a message re this bug report. I stopped
receiving weekly notifications of inaction some time ago (IIRC at the time of
the f29 release), and assumed the request for sponsor was dead. I had sent a
sample review to the person who had offered to sponsor the package, annotated
with comments and questions as to how to deal with things where I disagreed
with fedora-review, e.g. the complaint about the hidden .build-id directory,
and hadn't heard back. I guess we both dropped the ball.
I have been following the Fedora developer list since the initial request for
sponsor, and it is apparent that being a Fedora packager is a major commitment.
My focus is on the upstream: fielding user questions and bug reports,
developing a GUI version and associated API, etc. I do maintain the Debian
version, which has become straightforward, but that's the extent of my official
downstream involvement. (Ubuntu picks up ddcutil from Debian, and openSuSE
picks it up because I use OBS for builds.) I'll continue to maintain a COPR
build, but for now that needs to be the extent of my Fedora efforts. Please
close the request for sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component