Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded with TestGen4Web
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296
Summary: Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded with TestGen4Web Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nsheridan@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/testgen4web-runner/perl-TestGen4Web-Runner.sp... SRPM URL: http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/testgen4web-runner/perl-TestGen4Web-Runner-0.... Description: TestGen4Web::Runner is a perl module to replay files recorded with SpikeSource's TestGen4Web Recorder.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296
Niall Sheridan nsheridan@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462297
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296
Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mmaslano@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com 2008-11-05 10:19:14 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field (same as Perl) matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296
--- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com 2009-08-21 06:58:22 EDT --- Ping, cvs request? Or is it something blocking this package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov@gmail.com Depends on| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2009-10-02 04:38:15 EDT --- Dead review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Depends on|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) |
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org