Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple@ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/python-telepathy.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/python-telepathy-0.13.2-1.src... Description: Python libraries for use in Telepathy clients and connection managers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
bdpepple@ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sander@hoentjen.eu
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@ameritech.net 2006-09-03 09:14 EST ------- *** Bug 205066 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
------- Additional Comments From sander@hoentjen.eu 2006-09-03 09:42 EST ------- Spec file is basically the same as I had, only you used the correct naming for Fedora. Also the URL *could* be changed to http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/TelepathyPython but that doesn't really matter. I also had the examples packaged under docs, but I am not even sure if that is a good thing. I would approve, but I am still not in fedorabugs so I'll leave the review part until i am, maybe someone else will pick up before then.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
bdpepple@ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205343 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
sander@hoentjen.eu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |sander@hoentjen.eu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From sander@hoentjen.eu 2006-09-08 07:03 EST ------- GOOD - package meets naming and packaging guidelines. - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. - dist tag is present. - build root is correct. - license field matches the actual license. - license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. - source files match upstream: 39a07295c78699da6efc1e4638c53688 - BuildRequires are proper. - package builds in mock (x86_64). - rpmlint is silent. - final provides and requires are sane: python-telepathy-0.13.2-1.fc6.noarch.rpm python-telepathy = 0.13.2-1.fc6 = python(abi) = 2.4 - no shared libraries are present. - package is not relocatable. - owns the directories it creates. - doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. - no duplicates in %files. - file permissions are appropriate. - %clean is present. - no scriptlets present. - code, not content. - documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. - %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. - no headers. - no pkgconfig files. - no libtool .la droppings. - not a GUI app. - not a web app.
APPROVED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
bdpepple@ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
bdpepple@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@gmail.com 2007-10-12 12:51 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-telepathy New Branches: F-8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:41 EST ------- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
Brian Pepple bdpepple@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Brian Pepple bdpepple@gmail.com 2008-11-10 09:35:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-telepathy Short Description: Python bindings for Telepathy Owners: morgan.collett@gmail.com, tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net Branches: OLPC-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-11-10 12:02:01 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com 2010-06-10 16:32:25 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-telepathy New Branches: EL-6 Owners: pbrobinson sdz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
Sebastian Dziallas sebastian@when.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple@gmail.com, | |sebastian@when.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Dziallas sebastian@when.com 2010-07-20 19:30:24 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-telepathy New Branches: EL-6 Owners: pbrobinson sdz bpepple
I emailed Brian and he said that it would probably be better if someone else maintained the EPEL branches, since he's not currently running any systems that use EPEL. If you need additional confirmation, can you comment here please, Brian? For background, we're interested in maintaining these in EPEL since they are dependencies of the Sugar Environment, which we're trying to push into EPEL.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-07-21 01:02:11 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org