https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2322184
Bug ID: 2322184 Summary: Review Request: rust-asn1-rs-derive - Derive macros for rust-asn1-rs crate Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tfanelli@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tylerfanelli/rust-asn1-rs-derive_candidate... SRPM URL: https://github.com/tylerfanelli/rust-asn1-rs-derive_candidate/raw/refs/heads... Description: Derive macros for rust-asn1-rs crate Fedora Account System Username: tfanelli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2322184
Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://crates.io/crates/as | |n1-rs-derive Keywords| |AutomationTriaged
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8184261 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2322184
Tyler Fanelli tfanelli@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |decathorpe@gmail.com Flags| |needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail. | |com)
--- Comment #3 from Tyler Fanelli tfanelli@redhat.com --- Hi Fabio,
I've submitted all required information and the build succeeded, I just need approval to continue with the new package process.
For the future, am I able to do this process on my own, without the approval of anyone else? I only ask because I have to introduce a few more packages and don't want to interrupt others if not necessary.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2322184
Fabio Valentini decathorpe@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Flags|needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail. | |com) | Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed| |2024-10-30 10:46:28
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini decathorpe@gmail.com ---
For the future, am I able to do this process on my own, without the approval of anyone else?
No, all new packages need approval by a second person. To some degree, I really wonder how you got to be a packager without knowing these basics 😅
Additionally, in this case, a request for this package was already submitted elsewhere, so I'll close this one as a duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2312632 ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2322184
Cole Robinson crobinso@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |crobinso@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Cole Robinson crobinso@redhat.com --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #4)
For the future, am I able to do this process on my own, without the approval of anyone else?
No, all new packages need approval by a second person. To some degree, I really wonder how you got to be a packager without knowing these basics 😅
Lame and unhelpful comment. Not everyone lives and breaths fedora policy and packaging.
I think it's reasonable for someone who rarely submits new packages to ask if there's a simpler process they are missing, especially considering how much you've helped streamline the rust package process with rust2rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2322184
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini decathorpe@gmail.com --- I apologize for yesterday's quip - it was indeed not helpful.
I guess the NEEDINFO request for me threw me off - at least in Fedora, it's only used for really important actions and many contributors perceive it as "aggressive nagging". Just CCing me on this bug would have sufficed to get my attention.
I think it's reasonable for someone who rarely submits new packages to ask if there's a simpler process they are missing, especially considering how much you've helped streamline the rust package process with rust2rpm
I'm happy that you perceive it as streamlined.
But no, there are usually no shortcuts you can take for adding a new package to Fedora - with some small exceptions, see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#...
wrt/ Rust packages, the only relevant exception is usually the one for "compat" packages, i.e. for providing more than one version of a crate that is already packaged.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org