Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Summary: Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sean@middleditch.us QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Very simplistic MUD client for command line usage.
Note: Requires the libtelnet package under review at bug #515832.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
--- Comment #1 from Sean Middleditch sean@middleditch.us 2009-09-06 05:57:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-2.fc12.src.rpm
Fixed a typo I just caught in the source URL for the spec file. Updated to release -2 and added a changelog note.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Jan Klepek jan.klepek@hp.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jan.klepek@hp.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek@hp.com Flag| |fedora-review+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Jan Klepek jan.klepek@hp.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515832
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Bug 520343 depends on bug 515832, which changed state.
Bug 515832 Summary: Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Jan Klepek jan.klepek@hp.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
--- Comment #2 from Sean Middleditch sean@middleditch.us 2009-09-12 16:17:30 EDT --- Now that libtelnet is in F12, I tried a scratch build on Koji. That made it clear that I forgot some build requires on packages I had installed on my local machine (Koji is damn handy that way). Updated to 0.01-3 with the build requires added. Verified it works on Koji now.
Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-3.fc12.src.rpm
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1674042
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Jan Klepek jan.klepek@hp.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sean@middleditch. | |us)
--- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek jan.klepek@hp.com 2009-09-18 09:12:23 EDT --- 1] i didn't see there usage of fedora compiler flags. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags
2] md5sum of download from SOURCE is different from tar which is in src.rpm b6043dececbaa61e8a3b26a2bda33d38 clc-0.01.tar.gz ed6d17913a6f8e1d9db4a210f5edef34 SOURCES/clc-0.01.tar.gz
3] macros usage use only one style of macros or variable. not both in one spec file. so you eiter replace variables with corresponding macros or macros with variables. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros
otherwise it looks good spec file is in english and have correct name directories, files and ownership is correct compiling/building ok dependencies ok clean section present
please fix 1],2],3].
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Sean Middleditch sean@middleditch.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sean@middleditch. | |us) |
--- Comment #4 from Sean Middleditch sean@middleditch.us 2009-09-19 17:04:03 EDT --- 1) I am now explicitly setting the CFLAGS in the spec file, which both adds the Fedora optimization flags and also overrides the Makefile's defaults (so the spec file has to include a couple flags specific to clc).
2) Annoyingly, the tarballs were identical in contents other than timestamps on the files. I made sure I have the tarball directly from upstream in SOURCES now.
3) The package is using the macros/variables consistently. I had $RPM_BUILD_ROOT only and no references to %{buildroot}. The link you provided states that I should use one or the other (with no official preference towards either) and that I should not mix usage of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in a single spec file, which I already complied with. I converted to the macro style anyway since it looks nicer IMO, and I used the macro style for %{optflags} as well.
New files:
Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-4.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Jan Klepek jan.klepek@hp.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek jan.klepek@hp.com 2009-09-24 03:05:57 EDT --- approved
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Sean Middleditch sean@middleditch.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Sean Middleditch sean@middleditch.us 2009-09-24 03:54:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clc Short Description: Very simplistic MUD client for command line usage Owners: elanthis Branches: F12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-09-24 12:27:17 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343
Sean Middleditch sean@middleditch.us changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org