Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: python-orange - Orange data mining library for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
Summary: Review Request: python-orange - Orange data mining library for python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mrlhwliberty@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange.spec SRPM URL: http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange-2.0-0.1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Open source data visualization and analysis for novice and experts. Data mining through visual programming or Python scripting. Components for machine learning. Extensions for bioinformatics and text mining. Packed with features for data analytics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
--- Comment #1 from Howard Ning mrlhwliberty@gmail.com 2010-10-22 22:19:54 EDT --- 2.0-0.2: Add the desktop file.
http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange.spec http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange-2.0-0.2.fc14.src.rpm
koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2549955
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
--- Comment #2 from Howard Ning mrlhwliberty@gmail.com 2010-10-24 11:19:11 EDT --- 2.0-0.3: fix the license issues:
http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange.spec http://helloworld1.fedorapeople.org/python-orange-2.0-0.3.fc14.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian@bernewireless.net
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net 2011-01-04 12:05:55 EST --- You are using a snapshot release. Isn't the date missing in the release tag and the changelog entries?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter fabian@bernewireless.net 2011-01-04 12:07:57 EST --- I'm unsure about the name of this package. It's an application that is written in Python and they call most parts just orange.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
--- Comment #5 from Howard Ning mrlhwliberty@gmail.com 2011-01-04 12:12:38 EST --- Yes it is missing but it is not the major issue. The name is OK because it is called this in their debian package. Orange is another software. The real problem of this package is bundled library. I really appreciate if anyone can look into this problem.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
Stjepan Gros stjepan.gros@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stjepan.gros@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.gros@gmail.com 2011-01-11 12:26:13 EST --- *** Bug 666529 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
--- Comment #7 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.gros@gmail.com 2011-01-11 12:28:49 EST --- I also created package for orange not knowing that it was already done. Anyway, I don't insist on packaging orange so the Ning can use anything he finds usefull from my try. And I checked my package with rpmlint and there are no warning or error apart from rpath that I already described as potentially harmless in the bugzilla entry 666529.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
--- Comment #8 from Howard Ning mrlhwliberty@gmail.com 2011-01-11 12:38:54 EST --- python-orange has bundled library libsvm. It would be a major problem. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |658489(FE-BUNDLEDLIBS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
Matthias Runge mrunge@matthias-runge.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrunge@matthias-runge.de Status Whiteboard| |Stalled Submitter
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Runge mrunge@matthias-runge.de 2012-03-24 14:30:42 EDT --- Any progress here?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
--- Comment #10 from Howard Ning mrlhwliberty@gmail.com 2012-03-24 14:45:34 EDT --- There is no progress on my side. I don't know how to strip the libsvm out of the source code without major hac.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
Matthias Runge mrunge@matthias-runge.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|Stalled Submitter |
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Runge mrunge@matthias-runge.de 2012-03-24 15:15:44 EDT --- Ok, then I'd recommend to close this request and to open another when it's ready. You should ask upstream to fix this issue.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645321
Howard Ning mrlhwliberty@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Last Closed| |2012-03-24 15:32:51
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org