https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
Bug ID: 1157996 Summary: kanboard RPM package revision Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: magjogui@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporting my package
Spec URL: https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SPEC/
SRPM URL: https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SRPM/
Description: Kanboard is a simple visual task board web application. Fedora Account System Username: magjogui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
Eduardo Echeverria echevemaster@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |echevemaster@gmail.com Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #1 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemaster@gmail.com --- Magjoqui can you paste the direct links to the files? This is not due a cosmetic thing, generally, the srpm are revised with a tool called fedora-review which needs direct links.
magjogui is one of the guys that I was mentor in Fudcon, so, I will take care of its package and its mentoring process
I'm blocking it with FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #2 from magjogui magjogui@gmail.com --- Thanks Eduardo, the links that you require:
https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SPEC/kanboard.spec
https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SRPM/kanboard-1.0.8-1.fc...
Thanks in advance KR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
Eduardo Mayorga e@mayorgalinux.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |e@mayorgalinux.com Summary|kanboard RPM package |Review Request: kanboard - |revision |Simple visual task board
--- Comment #3 from Eduardo Mayorga e@mayorgalinux.com --- Please use your real full name in Bugzilla and send your self introduction to fedora-devel maling list according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Becom...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #4 from José Edgardo López Vásquez magjogui@gmail.com --- Done, I already change my name on bugzilla and send my selft introduction to the list.
KR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #5 from Eduardo Mayorga e@mayorgalinux.com --- - Make the package noarch.
- Is web-assets-devel really needed?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemaster@gmail.com --- - Add config (no-replace) to all the config files in your package, for maintain user configurations
- If you will package for EPEL family, you must to check what php versions are available in them; You have to use conditionals for disaggregate of that requires
- You have to ship a httpd conf prepared for 2.2 and 2.4 versions
- There are fonts in your package, you have to specify the licenses of them
- the tests in your package can be run without internet connection? if so, please do it in %check section
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets for to know how to treat your static files in a rpm package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #7 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemaster@gmail.com --- Any update?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #8 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemaster@gmail.com --- Again, any update?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
Haïkel Guémar karlthered@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |karlthered@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from Haïkel Guémar karlthered@gmail.com --- @José, please start doing informal reviews so that the sponsorship process gets started. Looks like Echevemaster could sponsor you, so please answer him, he will be a good mentor to you :)
Many people are waiting to have kanboard in Fedora, so do your best !
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org --- magjogui's scratch build of kanboard-1.0.18-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm for f22 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11273590
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org --- magjogui's scratch build of kanboard-1.0.18-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11273649
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |williamjmorenor@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |williamjmorenor@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #12 from William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com --- Hi, I will take your review request, please update to the last upstream release:
https://github.com/kanboard/kanboard/releases/tag/v1.0.36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |magjogui@gmail.com Flags| |needinfo?(magjogui@gmail.co | |m)
--- Comment #13 from William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com --- Any update?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
--- Comment #14 from William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com --- Any update here? If not answer I will must to close this ticket as a DEADREVIEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157996
William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(magjogui@gmail.co | |m)
--- Comment #15 from William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com --- Final ping
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org