https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
Bug ID: 2317961 Summary: Review Request: huion-switcher - Utility to switch Huion tablets into tablet mode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter.hutterer@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/rpms/huion-switcher.spec SRPM URL: https://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/rpms/huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc42.src.rp... Description: Utility to switch Huion tablets into tablet mode Fedora Account System Username: whot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |panemade@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review? CC| |panemade@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com --- Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
Suggestions: 1) The license written for this package is "GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND MIT OR Apache-2.0" but I think it should be written as "GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0)"
2) SPEC file in SRPM and SPEC file given in link itself does not match. Check more at the bottom of this review comment.
3) Resubmit this package SRPM and SPEC links for final approval of this package
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version 2". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/test/2317961-huion-switcher/licensecheck.txt [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [?]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 1749 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc42.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpdmt_9v16')] checks: 32, packages: 2
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s
Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output:
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/whot/huion-switcher/archive/refs/tags/0.5.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a595efecc78ee227bb1ac8ebf48bccea5c2b57a2553e88de3428dbbc3d438c04 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a595efecc78ee227bb1ac8ebf48bccea5c2b57a2553e88de3428dbbc3d438c04
Requires -------- huion-switcher (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.2.0)(64bit) libudev.so.1()(64bit) libudev.so.1(LIBUDEV_183)(64bit) libusb-1.0.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) udev
Provides -------- huion-switcher: huion-switcher huion-switcher(x86-64)
Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/test/2317961-huion-switcher/srpm/huion-switcher.spec 2024-11-04 11:33:37.965730159 +0530 +++ /home/test/2317961-huion-switcher/srpm-unpacked/huion-switcher.spec 2024-10-11 05:30:00.000000000 +0530 @@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.7.2) +## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: + release_number = 1; + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}} +## END: Set by rpmautospec + %bcond_without check %global udevdir %(pkg-config --variable=udevdir udev) @@ -59,3 +69,6 @@
%changelog -%autochangelog +## START: Generated by rpmautospec +* Fri Oct 11 2024 John Doe packager@example.com - 0.5.0-1 +- Uncommitted changes +## END: Generated by rpmautospec
Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2317961 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Haskell, SugarActivity, fonts, Python, Java, C/C++, R, Ocaml, Perl, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
--- Comment #2 from Peter Hutterer peter.hutterer@redhat.com --- Thanks heaps for the review. I've fixed:
- License is now "GPL-2.0-only AND MIT AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0)" - superfluous %changelog removed though fedora-review still complains about the diff. this appears to be a result of autorelease/autochangelog being replaced and the diff not being aware of it
Either way, both re-uploaded to the same URLS:
Spec URL: https://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/rpms/huion-switcher.spec SRPM URL: https://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/rpms/huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc42.src.rp...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://github.com/whot/hui | |on-switcher Keywords| |AutomationTriaged
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service fedora-review-bot@fedoraproject.org --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8225077 (succeeded)
Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-rev...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
--- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
Parag Nemade pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Parag Nemade pnemade@redhat.com --- Looks good now :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
Peter Hutterer peter.hutterer@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|panemade@gmail.com |pnemade@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions fedora-admin-xmlrpc@fedoraproject.org --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/huion-switcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
--- Comment #6 from Peter Hutterer peter.hutterer@redhat.com --- Thanks again for the review, much appreciated!
fwiw, I've reassigned this to your RH account, otherwise I can't get past the SCM request - assignee and reviewer differ.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-4b2b58689f (huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4b2b58689f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
Peter Hutterer peter.hutterer@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version| |huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc42 Last Closed| |2024-11-07 21:46:00
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-4b2b58689f (huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-5b7b41247a (huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5b7b41247a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-089c61bbd9 (huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-089c61bbd9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-089c61bbd9 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-089c61bbd9 *` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-089c61bbd9
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-5b7b41247a has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-5b7b41247a *` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5b7b41247a
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-089c61bbd9 (huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317961
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-5b7b41247a (huion-switcher-0.5.0-1.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org