https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095878
Bug ID: 1095878 Summary: Review Request: python-frozen-flask - freezes a Flask application into a set of static files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: diegodc.uy@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://lunaticc0.fedorapeople.org/python-frozen-flask/python-frozen-flask.sp... SRPM URL: http://lunaticc0.fedorapeople.org/python-frozen-flask/python-frozen-flask-0.... Description: Frozen-Flask freezes a Flask application into a set of static files. The result can be hosted without any server-side software other than a traditional web server. FAS username: lunaticc0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095878
--- Comment #1 from Diego Daguerre diegodc.uy@gmail.com --- This is my first package and I need sponsor.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095878
Eduardo Echeverria echevemaster@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |echevemaster@gmail.com Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |echevemaster@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemaster@gmail.com --- I will take this
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095878
Eduardo Echeverria echevemaster@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemaster@gmail.com --- I've had the opportunity of to mentor of Diego face to face, here in FISL Brazil, and seems that all is ok here. so I will to do the offical review of this package
Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/echevemaster/1095878-python-frozen- flask/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: python-frozen-flask-0.11-1.fc21.noarch.rpm python-frozen-flask-0.11-1.fc21.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint python-frozen-flask 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires -------- python-frozen-flask (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python-flask
Provides -------- python-frozen-flask: python-frozen-flask
Source checksums ---------------- https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/F/Frozen-Flask/Frozen-Flask-0.11.tar... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : c348e0165b161efa44770157eba3e006cc6a1e9867bfd74670cbc56529cc5512 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : c348e0165b161efa44770157eba3e006cc6a1e9867bfd74670cbc56529cc5512
Diego you can now proceed to request a repository: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
Welcome aboard.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095878
Diego Daguerre diegodc.uy@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from Diego Daguerre diegodc.uy@gmail.com --- Thanks for welcolme and the support.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-frozen-flask Short Description: freezes a Flask application into a set of static files Owners: lunaticc0 echevemaster Branches: f20 f19 InitialCC: echevemaster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095878
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095878
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095878
Petr Viktorin pviktori@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pviktori@redhat.com Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2018-12-06 09:41:57
--- Comment #6 from Petr Viktorin pviktori@redhat.com --- python-frozen-flask is in Fedora. I assume this bug was just forgotten, so I'm closing it.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org