Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ifoox@redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_1fc.src.rpm Description: Jython is an implementation of the high-level, dynamic, object-oriented language Python seamlessly integrated with the Java platform. The predecessor to Jython, JPython, is certified as 100% Pure Java. Jython is freely available for both commercial and non-commercial use and is distributed with source code. Jython is complementary to Java and is especially suited for the following tasks: Embedded scripting - Java programmers can add the Jython libraries to their system to allow end users to write simple or complicated scripts that add functionality to the application. Interactive experimentation - Jython provides an interactive interpreter that can be used to interact with Java packages or with running Java applications. This allows programmers to experiment and debug any Java system using Jython. Rapid application development - Python programs are typically 2-10X shorter than the equivalent Java program. This translates directly to increased programmer productivity. The seamless interaction between Python and Java allows developers to freely mix the two languages both during development and in shipping products.
I am submitting this package with several other packages (5 in total), and these are my first packages for Extras, so they may need a sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
ifoox@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
ifoox@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |193889, 193896, 193897
------- Additional Comments From ifoox@redhat.com 2006-06-02 15:28 EST ------- Adding bug dependencies for all the packages that Jython depends on: * mysql-connector-java * ht2html * libreadline-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-07-14 03:01 EST ------- Just some quick comments from looking at parts of the spec file..
- Summary is odd: "Java source interpreter" - Source lines should be URLs to sources - Remove Epoch - Change Group to Development/Libraries - Make BuildRoot standard - Remove these lines... Distribution: JPackage Vendor: JPackage Project
That's it for now. Thanks for submitting this. If nobody picks this up, I'll do a formal review once the dependencies have been approved.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-07-14 03:18 EST ------- BTW, I don't think we should be linking libreadline-java with jython since I believe the licenses are incompatible. See this thread for discussion and a potential solution: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=707283
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
Bug 193898 depends on bug 193889, which changed state.
Bug 193889 Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
Bug 193898 depends on bug 193897, which changed state.
Bug 193897 Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From ifoox@redhat.com 2006-09-08 20:51 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_2fc.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython.spec
(In reply to comment #2)
Just some quick comments from looking at parts of the spec file..
- Summary is odd: "Java source interpreter"
Fixed
- Source lines should be URLs to sources
The source appears to be a CVS snapshot, but I'll check to make sure whether it's not downloaded.
- Remove Epoch
Fixed.
- Change Group to Development/Libraries
Fixed.
- Make BuildRoot standard
Fixed.
- Remove these lines...
Distribution: JPackage Vendor: JPackage Project
Fixed.
Also fixed: - Add dist tag. - Fix compile line to use the system Python libraries instead of the python2.2 source. - Remove Source1 (python2.2 library). - Move buildroot removal from prep to install. - Use libedit (EditLine) instead of GNU readline.
(In reply to comment #3)
BTW, I don't think we should be linking libreadline-java with jython since I believe the licenses are incompatible. See this thread for discussion and a potential solution: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=707283
I've built the latest version of libreadline-java against libedit (EditLine) instead of GNU readline, libedit is LGPL, and is what the poster in the thread you mention proposes. So this should be fine. See bug #193896.
There are still many issues to resolve with this package, I will try to resolve most of them tomorrow. But I have a few questions which hopefully someone can answer.
1. rpmlint gives me errors like this when running it on the main rpm: E: jython non-executable-script /usr/share/jython/Lib/Cookie.py 0644 It doesn't give it for all the .py files in that directory, even though they all have the same permissions. Should these be 755, or should these files be moved to /usr/lib instead?
2. What should be the group for jython-demo? I put it in Development/Documentation along with the manual and javadoc, but I'm not sure this is right.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
Bug 193898 depends on bug 193896, which changed state.
Bug 193896 Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-09-08 22:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4)
- Change Group to Development/Libraries
Fixed.
I'm sorry. This was another mistake of mine. It should be "System Environment/Libraries".
- rpmlint gives me errors like this when running it on the main rpm:
E: jython non-executable-script /usr/share/jython/Lib/Cookie.py 0644 It doesn't give it for all the .py files in that directory, even though they all have the same permissions. Should these be 755, or should these files be moved to /usr/lib instead?
I think staying in /usr/share is fine. I don't know why it's complaining.
- What should be the group for jython-demo?
I put it in Development/Documentation along with the manual and javadoc, but I'm not sure this is right.
Actually, FE has no Development/Documentation group. It should just be Documentation. I can't think of a better place for the demos.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From ifoox@redhat.com 2006-09-09 13:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
- Change Group to Development/Libraries
Fixed.
I'm sorry. This was another mistake of mine. It should be "System Environment/Libraries".
Seems like System/Environment/Libraries is less appropriate for jython than Development/Libraries or even Development/Languages. Why do you say that System/Environment/Libraries is the correct one?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-09-09 13:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6)
Seems like System/Environment/Libraries is less appropriate for jython than Development/Libraries or even Development/Languages.
Development/Libraries doesn't really apply to Java, since it's for .so files and other things you would only use at build-time. I think you're right about Development/Languages though. Let's use that one.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From ifoox@redhat.com 2006-09-09 14:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7)
I think you're right about Development/Languages though. Let's use that one.
OK.
Another important issue which I'm not sure how to address is the license. The license file calls it the 'Jython license' (http://www.jython.org/Project/license.html), but there is not equivalent appropriate license that rpmlint likes. What do we do in a case like this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From ifoox@redhat.com 2006-09-09 14:33 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_3fc.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython.spec
There are currently 3 issues remaining with the package (that I know of) 1. License (comment #8): W: jython invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License
2. Copying files from python: For some reason the jython buildsystem copies some files from the python standard library into it's own directory. Since I made it use the system python instead of the python2.2 that was previously included, we now have duplication. These are the files that also produce permission errors from rpmlint: E: jython non-executable-script /usr/share/jython/Lib/uu.py 0644 This is because they are not executable but contain a #!. I'll try to figure out why jython copies these files and if we can make it use the ones in %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages instead. If not I'll see if I can symlink them instead of copying.
3. Missing jar manifest in one of the demo jars: E: jython-demo no-jar-manifest /usr/share/jython/Demo/jreload/example.jar I'm not sure whether this is an important issue since this is just a demo jar, which will probably function without the manifest file anyway.
I'll try to resolve issue 2 (and maybe 3) today and tomorrow, but any suggestions are welcome. But I'm really not sure what to do about issue 1.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-09-10 00:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9)
There are currently 3 issues remaining with the package (that I know of)
- License (comment #8):
W: jython invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License
I think we can ignore this.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
green@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info |green@redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From ifoox@redhat.com 2006-09-22 10:09 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_4fc.src.rpm
I've fixed the problem with the non-executable scripts by bringing back jython's copy of python2.2 which was carried in the srpm, since it doesn't actually work when I link it against python 2.4. I think that the no-manifest issue can be ignored since the example jar works fine anyway. If you think that that the license issue is OK then I think this is pretty much done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From ifoox@redhat.com 2006-09-22 10:29 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_5fc.src.rpm
Minor fix, removing redundant patch.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From ifoox@redhat.com 2006-09-28 19:25 EST ------- Anthony, Any chance you could take a look at this soon?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-10-21 14:02 EST ------- Sorry for the long delay.
Where did you get the source tarball from? If we're not using an upstream release, then the spec file should explain where the sources are from and how to get them.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-10-21 14:05 EST ------- Building with 'mock' fails like so...
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot Binary file /var/tmp/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_5fc.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gcj/jython/jreload.so.debug matches Found '/var/tmp/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_5fc.fc6-root-mockbuild' in installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.37933 (%install)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From overholt@redhat.com 2006-11-16 13:30 EST ------- I've taken this over from Igor. I made a few changes and updated to 2.2a1. I've also fixed the mock error you were seeing, Anthony, and added a script to fetch the tarball and explain how to do it.
http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython-2.2-0.a1.1jpp_1fc.fc7.src.rpm
and the differences between my spec and Igor's latest:
http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec.diff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From ifoox@redhat.com 2006-11-16 23:15 EST ------- Andrew, thanks for taking care of this. Unfortunately I couldn't find the time to deal with it lately.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-12-04 14:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16)
I've taken this over from Igor. I made a few changes and updated to 2.2a1. I've also fixed the mock error you were seeing, Anthony, and added a script to fetch the tarball and explain how to do it.
Sorry I missed the update on this. I'm rerunning it in mock and will go through the formal review assuming there are no problems.
Thanks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-12-04 15:59 EST ------- Andrew - the package naming goes against current package naming rules...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/JavaPackageNaming
I've simply been removing the "jpp" part from my packages (see itext, for instance).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From overholt@redhat.com 2006-12-19 14:56 EST ------- Newly updated spec and SRPM without jpp:
http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython-2.2-0.a1.1.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From overholt@redhat.com 2006-12-19 15:07 EST ------- Newly updated spec and SRPM with correct release:
http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython-2.2-0.1.a1.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2006-12-20 08:33 EST ------- Thanks Andrew. Here's the full review. I only have two comments. One seems easy and the other looks like a little more work. Look for the lines starting in 'X'.
* package meets and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * License text included in package. * source files match upstream (extracted from upstream cvs so no md5sum available.) * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock.
* rpmlint jython-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.i386.rpm W: jython invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License We can ignore this.
rpmlint jython-demo-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.i386.rpm W: jython-demo invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License E: jython-demo no-jar-manifest /usr/share/jython/Demo/jreload/example.jar We can ignore these.
rpmlint jython-javadoc-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.i386.rpm W: jython-javadoc invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License We can ignore this.
rpmlint jython-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.src.rpm W: jython invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License We can ignore this.
X are these final provides and requires are sane?: jython-2.2-0.1.a1.fc6.i386.rpm jython-2.2.jar.so jython = 2.2-0.1.a1.fc6 == java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 jpackage-utils >= 0:1.5 oro python >= 2.4 servlet
Don't we need to Require libreadline-java and mysql-connector-java?
* shared libraries are present, but no ldconfig required. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present * scriptlets OK * code, not content. X ht2html generated documentation isn't being generated even though we require ht2html. I think build.xml needs one more if="full-build" removed, and then these docs should probably go in a documentation package. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app (no .desktop file required). * not a web app.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
------- Additional Comments From overholt@redhat.com 2007-01-11 18:02 EST ------- Okay, I've (finally!) taken care of the two issues above. Here's the new spec and SRPM:
http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython-2.2-0.2.a1.src.rpm
Here's a diff from the most recently reviewed spec and the one above:
http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec.patch
Thanks!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
green@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From green@redhat.com 2007-01-21 21:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23)
Okay, I've (finally!) taken care of the two issues above. Here's the new spec and SRPM:
rpmlint now complains about the explicit libreadline-java dependency, but I think this must be a bug in rpmlint. So... APPROVED!
Be sure to close this bug once you've pushed the package out. Thanks!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
overholt@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaels@redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From overholt@redhat.com 2007-02-10 12:27 EST ------- *** Bug 227078 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2007-06-01 01:27 EST ------- This package seems to have been imported and built a while back. Closing this review bug now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
Ruediger Landmann r.landmann@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |r.landmann@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #27 from Ruediger Landmann r.landmann@redhat.com 2010-07-26 20:29:11 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: jython New Branches: EL-5 Owners: rlandmann InitialCC:
I have discussed this with Andrew Overholt, the package owner, and he is happy for me to maintain this branch.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
--- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-07-30 15:49:52 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla