[Bug 1352169] New: Review Request: zerotier - Network Virtualization Everywhere https://www.zerotier.com/ - package-review

[Bug 1352169] New: Review Request: zerotier - Network Virtualization Everywhere https://www.zerotier.com/

[Bug 1364738] New: Review...

[Bug 1497594] New: Review...

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 1 July 2016 Fri, 1 Jul '16

4:53 p.m.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352169 Bug ID: 1352169 Summary: Review Request: zerotier - Network Virtualization Everywhere https://www.zerotier.com/ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: kris(a)lxsystems.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://lxsystems.de/zero/zerotier.spec SRPM URL: http://lxsystems.de/zero/zerotier-1.1.4-2.src.rpm Description: ZeroTier () is a GPLv3 licenced software based network virtualization tool. The software source is maintained on GitHub (https://github.com/zerotier/ZeroTierOne). The current binary installers (distributed on zerotier.com) are built with a self-maintained non-standard build system. The intention of this package is to properly integrate the software into the Fedora/RedHat/CentOS eco-system. Additional info: this is my first package submission, I hope it doesn't contain huge issues. I'm not sure about how to support old init.d and new systemd based systems in the same time: the %posttrans section of the .spec file contains the respective logic (this is how it is done in the original zerotier rpms as well). I'm almost sure this is not ok, though I have no idea how to manage this in a clean way (I would like to avoid two separate srpms). The package builds on koji with "14733246 build (f25, zerotier-1.1.4-2.src.rpm) completed successfully" (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14733246) Fedora Account System Username: kris11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Show replies by date

Red Hat Bugzilla

Friday, 1 July Fri, 1 Jul

4:53 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1352169] Review Request: zerotier - Network Virtualization Everywhere https://www.zerotier.com/

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352169 Kristof Szabo <kris(a)lxsystems.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

4:59 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1352169] Review Request: zerotier - Network Virtualization Everywhere https://www.zerotier.com/

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352169 --- Comment #1 from Kristof Szabo <kris(a)lxsystems.de> --- I think I should have mentioned explicitly that I'm seeking for a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

Sunday, 3 July Sun, 3 Jul

5:51 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 1352169] Review Request: zerotier - Network Virtualization Everywhere https://www.zerotier.com/

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352169 Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hegjon(a)gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> ---

...

I'm not sure about how to support old init.d and new systemd based systems in the same time

Upstream solved this in a good way in their spec file: https://github.com/zerotier/ZeroTierOne/blob/master/zerotier-one.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

1:21 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1352169] Review Request: zerotier - Network Virtualization Everywhere https://www.zerotier.com/

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352169 --- Comment #3 from Kristof Szabo <kris(a)lxsystems.de> --- Thanks for looking at this, upstream just released a new stable version 4 days ago which I overlooked. Let me have a look at this new spec file (whether it builds with koji, etc.) and come back with an update. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

Monday, 4 July Mon, 4 Jul

2:16 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1352169] Review Request: zerotier - Network Virtualization Everywhere https://www.zerotier.com/

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352169 François Kooman <fkooman(a)tuxed.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fkooman(a)tuxed.net --- Comment #4 from François Kooman <fkooman(a)tuxed.net> --- I've been working on the same thing for the last month and was about to open a review request when I found this one. I've been working with upstream on packaging this and dealing with unbundling the included libraries in the `ext` folder and following the Fedora oackaging guidelines to the best of my knowledge and requesting updates to the various dependencies of the packages in rawhide, f24 and epel. All dependencies are sorted out now in rawhide and available in updates-testing (F24) and epel-testing (EL7). SPEC: https://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/zerotier-one/zerotier-one.spec SRPM: https://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/zerotier-one/zerotier-one-1.1.6-2.fc23.s... Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14766141 Upstream is working on builds for other platforms, especially CentOS 6 not using systemd and for customers not wanting to enable EPEL on their machines, that is why there is a spec file in the zerotier repo. I'm already a Fedora packager and would only require a (formal) review, but am using the `zerotier-one` name as the package name instead of `zerotier`. So not sure if I should open a new request, or we can somehow work together on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

2:33 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 1352169] Review Request: zerotier - Network Virtualization Everywhere https://www.zerotier.com/

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352169 --- Comment #5 from François Kooman <fkooman(a)tuxed.net> --- Upstream bug regarding LDFLAGS override that still needs to be fixed: https://github.com/zerotier/ZeroTierOne/issues/346 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

Red Hat Bugzilla

Wednesday, 6 July Wed, 6 Jul

4:19 p.m.