Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: maven-remote-resources-plugin - Maven Remote Resources Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
Summary: Review Request: maven-remote-resources-plugin - Maven Remote Resources Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huwang@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-remote-resources-plugin/maven-... SRPM URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-remote-resources-plugin/maven-... Description: Process resources packaged in JARs that have been deployed to a remote repository. The primary use case being satisfied is the consistent inclusion of common resources in a large set of projects. Maven projects at Apache use this plug-in to satisfy licensing requirements at Apache where each project much include license and notice files for each release.
Scratch built in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2224845
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |guido.grazioli@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2010-06-02 07:14:28 EDT --- Reviewing this package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
--- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2010-06-02 08:25:33 EDT --- NEEDSWORK - rpmlint output: maven-remote-resources-plugin.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C Process resources packaged in JARs that have been deployed to a remote repository. maven-remote-resources-plugin.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C The primary use case being satisfied is the consistent inclusion of common resources - Please fix those two lines
maven-remote-resources-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-remote-resources-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-remote-resources-plugin maven-remote-resources-plugin.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: maven-remote-resources-plugin-1.1.tar.bz2 - These are false positives
OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - The package must meet the Java Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is ASL 2.0) NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2224845 (against dist-f14-maven221 target) OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. (exported from svn) NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros NA - The package must contain code, or permissable content (no content) NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. (obsoletes maven2-plugin-remote-resources <= 0:2.0.8) OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release
OTHER: - %{name} could be used in %add_to_maven_depmap - please add comment in the specfile for Patch0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
--- Comment #3 from huwang huwang@redhat.com 2010-06-02 23:06:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2)
NEEDSWORK - rpmlint output: maven-remote-resources-plugin.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C Process resources packaged in JARs that have been deployed to a remote repository. maven-remote-resources-plugin.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C The primary use case being satisfied is the consistent inclusion of common resources
- Please fix those two lines
Fixed.
maven-remote-resources-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-remote-resources-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-remote-resources-plugin maven-remote-resources-plugin.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: maven-remote-resources-plugin-1.1.tar.bz2
- These are false positives
OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - The package must meet the Java Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is ASL 2.0) NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2224845 (against dist-f14-maven221 target) OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. (exported from svn) NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros NA - The package must contain code, or permissable content (no content) NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. (obsoletes maven2-plugin-remote-resources <= 0:2.0.8) OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release
OTHER:
- %{name} could be used in %add_to_maven_depmap
- please add comment in the specfile for Patch0
Fixed Please review again, thanks.
Spec URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-remote-resources-plugin/maven-... SRPM URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-remote-resources-plugin/maven-...
Scratch built in koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2226359
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazioli@gmail.com 2010-06-03 04:01:52 EDT --- Package APPROVED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
--- Comment #5 from huwang huwang@redhat.com 2010-06-03 06:36:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-remote-resources-plugin Short Description: Maven Remote Resources Plugin Owners: huwang Branches: InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
huwang huwang@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-06-03 16:36:35 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
--- Comment #7 from huwang huwang@redhat.com 2010-06-04 02:51:26 EDT --- Built in koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=176541
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598929
huwang huwang@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org