Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
Summary: Review Request: qsa Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: frank-buettner@gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Description: qsa is an module for Qt to make application scriptable. At this time I can't present an full working spec/SRP file, because I have seen, that somebody I working on an Qt4 package. So I will/can't present my QT4 spec file. I use only my file for testing. And Qt4 is needes for my package. So I present my primary specfile for preview. And ask if there an interest to add qsa to Fedora Extras. The full description of QSA can be view here: http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/addon/qsa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From giallu@gmail.com 2006-05-13 08:03 EST ------- I have a semi-working spec file for the Qt 3 based one (1.1.x). I did not check the Qt4 source package but I expect the build procedure to be the same ( i.e. plain broken :) ) so if you still have not started to write the spec maybe you can benefit from my previous work.
Do you need/want me to submit a formal review request?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-05-13 09:13 EST ------- I have start written the qsa spec file for Qt4. But this is very difficult at this time without seen the final one for Qt4. So I write it so, that it all way's work. But one feature of qsa must be disabled. When you have an working spec file for qsa then you can post it here and do the job. And I close this review. I think to modify it for Qt4 is not very hard when you disable the editor feature then you can use your spec file for QSA 1.2.1 with Qt 4.1.2. compiling works with configure -release -no-editor -prefix ...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter@math.unl.edu
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 10:09 EST ------- FYI, qt4 review is bug 188180 I'd say base your qsa work off that, for now, at least.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 10:11 EST ------- As for qsa/qt3, qsa/qt4, I'd recommend submitting each as a separate review request (unless it's more convenient to build package both from a single specfile). Once a spec/srpm is mentioned here, I can start a review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-05-13 10:28 EST ------- Ok I do the work for qsa/Qt4 and Gianluca Sforna can do this for qsa/Qt3. I have found possible a solution for the qt3support part problem.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-05-13 12:33 EST ------- So the first version of the spec file is ready. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa.spec?download As far the Qt4 package is ready I can remove the hard coded Qt path and the rest of the work.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 12:43 EST ------- There's no need to hard-code the qt path, at least not in the qt4 case, since it uses pkg-config. Use this instead to define qtdir:
BuildRequires: qt4-devel %global qtdir %(pkg-config --variable=prefix QtCore)
and %files should probably be like: %files ... %qtdir/lib/libqsa.so.*
%files devel ... %qtdir/lib/libqsa.so
qsa-devel certainly will need Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Requires: qt4-devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qsa |Review Request: qsa: Qt | |Script for Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |193256
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
lordzanon@poczta.onet.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lordzanon@poczta.onet.pl
------- Additional Comments From lordzanon@poczta.onet.pl 2006-05-28 10:44 EST ------- Well, are there any particular reasons qt3 package cannot make its way into fc5 extras? At least two programs would benefit from it (LabPlot and museek). Greets.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-05-28 10:48 EST ------- Yes. For Qt3 you will need another version of QSA.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From lordzanon@poczta.onet.pl 2006-05-28 10:59 EST ------- So this BR is for qt4 qsa. Will have to wait till fc6 then.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-05-28 11:46 EST ------- You can build an package for QSA on Qt3 when you will. But you must call it then qsa3 or something like.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-05-28 12:23 EST ------- So after the new version of the Qt package is out here the first public version of the package. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa-1.2.1-3FC4.src.rpm?downloa...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-04 08:47 EST ------- so the next version is ready for review. here the URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa-1.2.1-4FC4.src.rpm?downloa... Changelog: - enable qt3support - Prevent for compiling using Qt >=4.2 witch will need another version of QSA. - add missing .h files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 10:13 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: * qsa.spec (and probably) qsa's configure script assumes QTLIB=%qtdir/lib QTINC=%qtdir/include which isn't necessarily true. In particular, on x86_64, QTLIB=%qtdir/lib64. Further, future iterations of qt4 may move QTLIB=%_libdir and/or QTINC=%_includedir.
specfile patch forthcoming.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info |rdieter@math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 10:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130748) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130748&action=vie...) fix QTLIB,QTINC
fix QTLIB,QTINC use install -p only libqsa.so -> -devel, others in main pkg
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 10:42 EST ------- NEEDSWORK * Source's should be full URL: Source: ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qsa/source/qsa-x11-opensource-%{version}.tar.gz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-08 11:31 EST ------- Thanks but I have found an Bug in the Qt packae the variable for the include path of the QtTest is wrong it show to %{prefix}/include but it must show %{prefix}/include/QtTest. So the line qtinc %(pkg-config QtTest --variable=includedir) must be qtinc %(pkg-config QtCore --variable=prefix)/include
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 11:37 EST ------- Thanks. I only chose QtTest because the --includedir output *was* prefix/include.
I suppose we could do something not-so-clean-but-still-should-work like: %define qtinc %(pkg-config QtCore --variable=includedir)/..
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-08 12:15 EST ------- Here the next version: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa-1.2.1-5FC5.src.rpm?downloa...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 12:31 EST ------- It'll speed the review process a bit too if you could also post links to the specfile as well. That way, I won't have to redownload the entire source over and over again.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 12:38 EST ------- %files list is still wrong. In particular, only libqsa.so should be in -devel, easiest template to use is something like:
%files %{qtlib}/lib*.so.*
%files devel %{qtlib}/lib*.so
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-08 12:39 EST ------- ok here the URL of the spec file. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa.spec?download it is every try the same.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 12:42 EST ------- And URL: ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qsa/source/qsa-x11-opensource-1.2.1.tar.gz Source: qsa-x11-opensource-%{version}.tar.gz
should be: URL: http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/ Source: ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qsa/source/qsa-x11-opensource-%{version}.tar.gz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #130748|0 |1 is obsolete| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-08 13:03 EST ------- the the next please::) http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa-1.2.1-6FC5.src.rpm?downloa... http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa.spec?download
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 15:00 EST ------- Personally, I'd feel more comfortable if you used (something like): %define qtinc %(dirname $(pkg-config QtCore --variable=includedir)) instead of %define qtinc %(pkg-config QtCore --variable=prefix)/include
In case we ever do decide to move it out of the qt-prefix (to say, %_includedir).
But that's your call as maintainer.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-08 15:29 EST ------- Yes this can be useful. So here the new one: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa-1.2.1-7FC5.src.rpm?downloa... http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa.spec?download rpmlint say that the doc part of the devel package are not nice.:( Or can we ignore this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 16:02 EST ------- Learned something cool today about qmake, you may want to consider this cleaner/simpler method of determining QTDIR, QTINC, QTLIB:
%define qtdir %(qmake4 -query QT_INSTALL_PREFIX) %define qtinc %(qmake4 -query QT_INSTALL_HEADERS) %define qtlib %(qmake4 -query QT_INSTALL_LIBS)
re: rpmlint A couple of things: 1. make sure %defattr is *first*, so %files should be: %files %defattr(-,root,root) ...
2. why in -devel %defattr(755,root,root) instead of %defattr(-,root,root)?
3. Re: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding, --hidden-file-or-dir warnings. IMO, these are small-potatoes. You can fix these if you want, but it's not a blocker.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-08 16:37 EST ------- Ok now the package with the qmake use.:) http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa-1.2.1-8FC5.src.rpm?downloa... http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa.spec?download
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-08 16:52 EST ------- Change %files devel %defattr(0755,root,root) %attr(0644,root,root)%{qtinc}/* ...
To %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root) %{qtinc}/* ...
And we're *real* close. (unless you have a good reason for doing it your way).
I'll recheck all the blocker guidelines tomorrow morning...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
Bug 191589 depends on bug 193256, which changed state.
Bug 193256 Summary: qt4-devel: .qmake.cache missing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193256
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|193256 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-09 11:55 EST ------- Looks good, everything builds, installs, uninstalls fine for me.
APPROVED.
SHOULD items: * include in main pkg %doc README
* without modification, due to qt4 buglet (see bug #193602), a useless -debuginfo pkg will (likely?) get created. Until this is fixed (I'm leaning toward setting QMAKE_STRIP to empty by default), you'll have to workaround the problem. See texmaker bug #193601 for one such workaround.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-09 14:30 EST ------- So the readme is fixed. The debug "bug" will be better fixed global. Tell me when you have done it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-09 15:18 EST ------- FYI, just queue'd a fixed qt4 build for the QMAKE_STRIP issue.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-11 09:20 EST ------- So here comes the next now with contains in the debug file:) http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa.spec?download http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa-1.2.1-10FC5.src.rpm?downlo...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From belegdol@gmail.com 2006-06-11 11:06 EST ------- Would you mind if I used your spec to prepare a qsa package for qt3/fc5?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-11 11:19 EST ------- You can use it, but it will need mutch changes. Because for Qt3 you must use an other version on QSA. And the you shut call your package qsa3 so that there will be no conflicts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From belegdol@gmail.com 2006-06-11 11:37 EST ------- Thaks, I'll try to roll up a 1.1.4 package in the next few days. As for the naming convention, it seems stat if qt 4.1.x will make its way into fc5, it will be called qt4, while qt 3.3.x will be called just qt. So why not to rename your package to qsa4 (or qsa-qt4), while mine will be called just qsa (or qsa-qt3)? Wouldn't it be more consistent? I don't mean to be intrusive.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-11 12:04 EST ------- No because it is good enugh when your package wil be called qsa3. The additional qt is not needed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-11 13:56 EST ------- I forgot about the need for 2 qsa's. The packaging guidelines are relatively clear on this, that addons to a package foo should be named (something like) foo-addon.
In our case(s), I'd suggest naming *this* one qt4-qsa, and the other (qt3) one qt-qsa so it is immediately clear looking at the name which qt is assiciated with which qsa pkg.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
frank-buettner@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qsa: Qt |Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt |Script for Applications |Script for Applications
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-11 14:10 EST ------- The maning is only a little problem:)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-12 08:03 EST ------- Package has (already) been approved. Go ahead and import into cvs, request builds, etc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2006-06-12 09:33 EST ------- I will do it at 17:00 CEST.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
frank-buettner@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|193256 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-06-28 09:42 EST ------- Looks like the ACCEPT got lost in the bugzilla crash, reclosing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qsa: Qt |Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt |Script for Applications |Script for Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras@normalesup.org 2006-11-08 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29)
Change %files devel %defattr(0755,root,root) %attr(0644,root,root)%{qtinc}/* ...
To %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root) %{qtinc}/* ...
Rex, just for the record, it should have been "%defattr(0644,root,root,755)". See bug #214577. I imagine that it was a typo.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From rdieter@math.unl.edu 2006-11-08 11:21 EST ------- Heck, I *should* have simply suggested %defattr(-,root,root)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
frank-buettner@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2007-06-23 12:05 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qt4-qsa New Branches: F-7
Because the F-7 directory is missing in the CVS repo.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
frank-buettner@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2007-06-23 14:59 EST ------- found it:)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
frank-buettner@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2007-10-21 08:15 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qt4-qsa Remove Branches: devel
It can be removed for F-9 and higher, because it have reach it's EOL. And the script function is available since Qt 4.3. So it will be only need until F-8, to get old code working and give the developers some time to adapt her code to Qt 4.3.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:23 EST ------- Please follow the package end of life procedure for the devel branch: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner@gmx.net 2007-10-21 15:15 EST ------- done. dead.package file add and send the mail to rel-eng@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191589
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla