Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056
Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody@fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com CC: besfahbo@redhat.com
Fedora Merge Review: libvorbis
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libvorbis/ Initial Owner: besfahbo@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056
bdpepple@ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |bdpepple@ameritech.net Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056
bdpepple@ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bdpepple@ameritech.net |besfahbo@redhat.com CC| |bdpepple@ameritech.net Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@ameritech.net 2007-02-03 14:26 EST ------- Good: * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds in Mock.
Must Fix: * The devel package require should be: Requires: libvorbis = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} * Should use BuildRequires, instead of BuildPrereq for libogg * rpmlint gives the following error: E: libvorbis-devel obsolete-not-provided vorbis-devel * Is the static lib necessary? If so, it should be split out into a sub-package. Refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4...
Minor: * Doesn't use preferred buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Drop the '.' from the summary to quite rpmlint. * Does this package build using 'make %{_smp_mflags}'? * rpmlint warnings: W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/floor1_inverse_dB_table.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/framing.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/v-comment.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/helper.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/vorbis-fidelity.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/stereo.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/programming.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/oggstream.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/vorbisfile/fileinfo.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/vorbis.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/index.html W: libvorbis-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libvorbis-devel-1.1.2/vorbisfile/seeking.html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056
mclasen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|besfahbo@redhat.com |bdpepple@ameritech.net Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From mclasen@redhat.com 2007-02-08 12:12 EST ------- * Thu Feb 8 2007 Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com - 1:1.1.2-2 - Package review cleanups - Don't ship static libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium
------- Additional Comments From mclasen@redhat.com 2007-04-11 07:14 EST ------- Brian, anything left here ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056
bdpepple@ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@ameritech.net 2007-04-11 13:17 EST ------- Nope, you changes look fine.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
bdpepple@ameritech.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bdpepple@ameritech.net |mclasen@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: libvorbis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226056
mclasen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From mclasen@redhat.com 2007-08-10 21:30 EST ------- Review done.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org